Assessment
Rubrics
Definitions
Damian Coopers' 8 Big Ideas
15 Fixes
100

Definition

the evaluation or estimation of the nature, quality, or ability of someone or something, appraising something - measurement of skills, attitudes & beliefs trying to improve learning, level of performance

Formative

Concerned with the process

100

Definition

a guideline that includes criteria/outcomes desired from an assignment. 

a set of guidelines for assessment that states the characteristics and/or the dimensions being assessed with clear performance criteria and a rating scale

100

Evaluation

Making a judgement about the value/quality of something, the outcome, focus on grades, final review, product oriented, judgemental

What has been learned? Are goals attained? Standards met?

Summative (can be formative)

Concerned with the product

100

1 & 2 (purpose and plans)

1. Assessment serves different purposes at different times; it may be used to find out what students already know and can do; it may be used to help students improve their learning; or it may be used to let students, and their parents, know how much they have learned within a prescribed period of time (TLDR; has different purposes for different circumstances)

2. Assessment must be planned and purposeful. 

100

Fix 1: Include only achievement in students' grade

Fix 2: Provide support to students so they submit work on time

Fix 3: Encourage demonstration of learning.

Fix 1: do not grade on effort, participation, or adherence to class rules

Fix 2: set up support systems to reduce/eliminate late work; do not reduce marks on work submitted late - does not result in changes behaviour

Fix 3: Mastery! seek evidence that more work results in higher achievement; do not give bonus points or extra credit

200

Assessment FOR Learning

Informs students about their own learning

shows them where they are in relation to learning targets (criteria)

formative assessment/ pre-assessment

checkpoint for your students

ex. KWL

200

Make your own!

Positive

Start with what you want

Make it growth based

200

Criterion Referenced vs. Norm Referenced vs. Self-Referenced

Criterion Referenced: assessment of students' success in meeting stated objectives, learning goals, expectations, or criteria based on absolute standards

Norm Referenced: assessment/evaluation in relation to other students within a class or across classes/schools or a segment of the population

Self-Referenced: Assessment designed to compare an individual's performance with his or her previous performance

200

3 & 4 (balanced and instruction)

3. Assessment must be balanced, including oral and performance as well as written tasks, and be flexible in order to improve learning for all students.

4. Assessment and instruction are inseparable because effective assessment informs learning. 

200

Fix 4: Encourage original, honest, quality, academic work & learning

Fix 5: Attendance is reported separate from grades

Fix 6: Assess/grade each student individually

Fix 4: determine actual level of student achievement (redo, alternate); do not punish academic dishonesty with reduced grades

Fix 5: report absences separately (reasons - irrelevant); attendance is not relevant to achievement grade (unless in music, drama, P.E, etc)

Fix 6: report individual achievement evidence; do not include group scores in grades

300

Assessment OF Learning

Summative assessment - sums up the learning

determines grade

informs others about students - accountability

results may be presented in a number of ways

for student learning

ex: presentation, diorama, exam

300

Criteria

a detailed list inside of a rubric that explains what the students have shown to receive a grade

characteristics or dimensions of student performance

300

Validity vs. Reliability

Validity: the degree to which an assessment strategy measures what it is intended to measure

Reliability: the consistency with which an assessment strategy measure whatever it is meant to measure

300

5 & 6 ( helpful and collaborative)

5. For assessment to be helpful to students, it must inform them in words, not numerical scores or letter grades, what they have done well, what they have done poorly, and what they need to do next in order to improve.

6. Assessment is a collaborative process that is most effective when it involves self, peer, and teacher assessment

300

Fix 7: Report standard-based learning

Fix 8: Use appropriate, clear performance standards

Fix 9: Cooperative Learning - Individual Assessment

Fix 7: organize and report evidence by standards/learning goals; do not summarize grading records into a single grade

Fix 8: organize and report evidence by standards/learning goals; don't assign grades using inappropriate or unclear standards; GIVE FEEDBACK

Fix 9: Compare each student's performance to preset standards; do not assign grades based on a student's achievement compared to other students

400

Assessment AS Learning

students reflect on their own learning and make adjustments

self assessment - metacognition

occurs as you're learning, assessing where your level of knowledge is at and what you can do to keep learning and striving for next

ex: self-assessment task


400

3 Point Scale

3 - Always Participates

2 - Sometimes Participates

1 - Rarely Participates

Start with your desired outcomes

Use positive language

400

Learning Goal vs. Standard vs. Performance Standards vs. Content Standards


Learning Goal: an observable result demonstrated by a student's knowledge, skills, or behaviour; a generic term

Standard: statement that describes what (content) and/or how well (performance) students are expected to understand and perform

Performance Standards: how well students are expected to demonstrate knowledge and skill

Content Standards: what students are expected to know and be able to do

400

7 (performance standards)

7. Performance standards are an essential component of effective assessment

400

Fix 10: Quality Assessment

Fix 11: Determine grades

Fix 12: Encourage completion of assessments to assess learning

Fix 10: rely on quality assessment (exercises/rubrics/clear); do not rely on assessments that fail to meet standards of quality

Why are we assessing? What are we assessing? How will we assess it?

Fix 11: consider other measures of central tendency (mean/median/mode); do not rely only on the mean and abandon average

Fix 12: use alternatives like reassessing or "insufficient evidence"; do not include zeros in grade determination where evidence is missing

500

Diagnostic vs. Formative vs. Summative

Diagnostic: assessment usually carried out prior to instruction that is designed to determine a student's attitude, skills, or knowledge to identify specific student needs.

Formative: assessment designed to provide direction for improvement and/or adjustment to a program for individual students or for a whole class. 

Summative: assessment designed to provide information about a student's achievement at or towards the end of a period of instruction


500

Features of Good-Quality Rubrics - Ken O'Connor

- help understand what is wanted on an assignment
- understand what quality looks like
- what we did well and what to improve on
- enable self-assessment
- help plan instruction, grade consistently, and justify grades
- help communicate with parents
- for and of learning
- easy to use, positive
- match task/assignment
- define levels of performance

500

Achievement

Grade vs. Mark

Achievement: the demonstration of student performance on learning goals measured against established criteria (performance standards)

Grade: the number or letter reported at the end of a period of time as a summary statement of student performance

Mark: the score given on any single test or performance

500

8 (grades and reporting)

8. Grading and reporting student achievement is a caring, sensitive process that requires teachers' professional judgement

500

Fix 13: Summative assessment for grades

Fix 14: Use current assessment results

Fix 15: Involve students in assessment and grading process

Fix 13: use only summative evidence; do not use information from formative or practice to determine grades

Fix 14: emphasize recent, current achievement; do not summarize evidence over time when learning is developmental

Fix 15: students can and should play key roles in assessment and grading; do not leave students out, assessment is done WITH them