SCOTUS cases
Ways to get to SCOTUS
Judicial activism vs restraint
Congressional checks on SCOTUS
Misc. (acts, history, etc.)
100

-scotus gave power of judicial review to itself and struck down writ of mandamus

+ (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

-scotus gave itself power to review state laws (GA couldn't rescind bribe contracts)

Marbury v. Madison

+ (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

Fletcher vs peck

100

SCOTUS can be forced to hear cases by Congress

Request for Original Jurisdiction

100

-Avoiding a constitutional issue if the issue can be settled own non-constitutional grounds

+ (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

-Court will interpret a law in a way that makes it constitutional

Doctrine of Strict Neccesity

+ (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

Doctrine of Saving Construction

100

supercede SCOUTUS context by changing constitution

amendment

100

established district courts

Judiciary act of 1789

200

-virginia scotus refused to follow a federal law

+ (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

virginia scotus refused to follow a federal law again

Martin vs hunters

+ (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

Cohens vs virginia

200

Appellate court asks SCOTUS to establish precedent on an unresolved issue 

Certification

200

- Laws are assumed to be constitutional until proved otherwise 

+ (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

-Narrow interpretation to avoid broad constitutional implications

Presumption of Constitutionality

+ (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

Narrowness Doctrine

200

decide who's on the court

appointment power

200

what court of appeals judges would do before 1891

judges would "ride the circuit" and travel to district courts to hear cases 2x/yr

300

wether fed can regulate slavery in new states (ruled Missouri compromise deprived slaveowners of property rights)

+ (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

-SCOTUS issues blanket ruling that anyone tried w/o a lawyer gets a retrial

Scott vs. sanford

+ (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

Gideon vs ?

300

Cases the court inherently must address (e.g, state laws that violate federal laws)

Appeal of Right

300

-A person must have an actual injury to sue as opposed to just a theoretically possible injury, can't sue on someone's behalf

+ (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

Has the issue been resolved already (e.g, law has been repealed before challenge reaches SCOTUS)

standing

 + (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

Mootness

300

remove justices

impeachment and removal

300

OG circuits vs modern

1 circuit for each state + Maine and KY which were territories [og]

11 circuits + 1 for DC +1 for federal stuff (like companies) [now]


400

-established right to privacy and protected birth control access, established precedent for gay marriage and abortion

+ (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

-protected abortion 

-griswald v. conneticut

+ (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

-roe v. wade

400

Case progresses to SCOTUS through federal appellate courts or from state supreme courts through appeals

Writ of Certiorari

400

Is this the right time to hear a case (law that has yet to be enforced cannot be challenged)

ripeness

400

limit ability

restrict jurisdiction

400

"En Bach"

-all Judges within a circuit hear an appeal instead of the normal 3

-rarely granted

500

-law yet to be enforced cant be challenged

poe vs. Ullman

500

A major political group (such as the NRA) grabs the attention of SCOTUS

+ (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

Recommendation by a certain government figure

Amicus Curiae

+ (had to combine 2 questions into one slide)

US Solicitor General (not technically required but SCOTUS won't say no)

500

legal vs political

justiciability

500

refuse to enact

defund a program