Story Basics
What was the 2nd pig's house made of?
Sticks
What is point of view?
Who is telling the story
What is a claim?
Your opinion
(an assertion, demand, or request for something believed to be rightful, such as property, money, or truth, often requiring supporting evidence)
How is the wolf described differently in each story?
Original = bad, wolf’s version = misunderstood
Q: fix this sentence:
the wolf said he just wanted sugar but he still scared the pigs
A: The wolf said he just wanted sugar, but he still scared the pigs.
Q: What does the wolf say he wanted in his version?
A: A cup of sugar
In The True Story of the 3 Little Pigs, who is telling the story?
The wolf
What is evidence?
Information (facts and details) from the text
What is one similarity between both stories, and why does it matter?
Same events; shows perspective changes meaning
Q: fix this sentence:
in the original story the wolf is dangerous
A: In the original story, the wolf is dangerous.
Q: What is the main problem in both stories?
A: The conflict between the wolf and the pigs
Why are the two stories different?
Because they are told from different perspectives
Give an example of evidence from the original story that shows the wolf is guilty
The wolf blows down the pigs’ houses and tries to eat them
Which version is more convincing and why? Use both texts.
(Student must compare + justify)
Q: fix this sentence:
the pigz were scary they run away and hide from the wolf
A: The pigs were scared, so they ran away and hid from the wolf.
How do the two versions of The Three Little Pigs and The True Story of the Three Little Pigs present the wolf differently?
The original shows him as dangerous, while his version presents him as misunderstood
Why is it important to hear both sides of a story?
To understand different viewpoints / get the full picture
It helps you make a more informed and fair judgment
What is a strong claim you could make about whether the wolf is guilty?
The wolf is guilty / not guilty (must be clear opinion)
Although the wolf claims he is innocent, what evidence challenges his claim?
He still destroys houses and scares the pigs
Q: fix this sentence:
after reading both storys i belieav the wolf is guilty.this shows he is not safe
After reading both stories, I believe the wolf is guilty. This shows he is not safe.
What actions of the wolf create tension in both stories?
Blowing down houses and approaching the pigs
Which perspective seems more reliable and why? Use reasoning.
(Student must justify with evidence)
How does reasoning strengthen your argument about whether the wolf is guilty?
It explains how the evidence proves your claim
How does the wolf’s explanation of events change the reader’s understanding of what happened compared to the original story? Use evidence from both texts.
The wolf explains that the houses fell by accident and that he only wanted sugar, while the original story shows him intentionally blowing down houses to harm the pigs. This changes whether the reader sees him as guilty or misunderstood.
FREE POINTS
lucky you