ARISTOTLE
ATHENS
ARISTOPHANES/OBESITY
AMPLIFY/AMPLIFY-EXT
JIN
100

The total number of patients randomized in Aristotle

18,201

100

What type of trial is the Athens study

Retrospective, Observational, Real-World Database Analysis

100

The number of patients in each arm of the Eliquis vs Xarelto cohort in the Aristophanes Obesity Subgroup Analysis

20,431

100

Amplify-EXT was published in this journal

New England Journal of Medicine

100

Jin et al was published in this journal

Thrombosis Research

200

The primary efficacy endpoint of Aristotle

To determine whether Eliquis was non inferior to Warfarin in reducing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism

200

How many patients were included in the Athens analysis

34,638

200

The RRR for Eliquis in the incidence of major bleeding in patients with obesity vs Xarelto

48%

200

percentage of patients enrolled in Amplify who had an unprovoked DVT or PE at baseline.

90%

200

What were the 3 Primary Outcomes in Jin

Recurrent VTE

Intracranial Hemorrhage

Non-Intracranial Hemorrhage

300

The percentage of patients in Aristotle with a Chads score of 3 or greater

30%

300

Athens was published in this journal

Journal of Clinical Medicine

300

The Aristophanes subgroup analysis for obesity was published in this journal

Journal of Clinical Medicine

300

In Amplify-EXT, Patients in the Eliquis arm were treated with this dose and for this length of time

2.5mg twice daily for 12 months

300

What was the RRR for Eliquis vs Xarelto for Recurrent VTE

20%

400

The percentage RRR for Eliquis vs Warfarin in major bleeding

31%

400

Which organization(s) funded the research for the Athens Study

Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer

400

Eliquis had an equal incidence of stroke/se in patients with morbid obesity vs this OAC

Xarelto

400

In Amplify-EXT, Eliquis was similar to placebo for this endpoint

Major bleeding

400

Which product showed superiority for Intracranial Hemorrhage, Eliquis or Xarelto

Neither.  The confidence interval crossed the line of no effect, therefore the outcome for ICH must be considered similar in effect.

500

Eliquis increases the risk of this

bleeding and can cause serious, potentially fatal bleeding

500

The assessed outcomes of stroke/SE and incidence of major bleeding also required this as an inclusion criteria.

Hospitalization

500

The RRR for Eliquis in the incidence of major bleeding in patients with morbid obesity vs Xarelto

53%

500

Amplify-EXT primary efficacy endpoint

Recurrent VTE or all-cause death

500

What was the RRR for Eliquis vs Xarelto for Non-Intracranial Hemorrhage

44%

600

Eliquis had more bleeding in this component of major bleeding

intraocular

600

What was the propensity score matching ratio in the Athens study

1:5

600

In the Aristophanes subgroup analysis for Obesity, Eliquis showed superiority in major bleeding vs these OAC's.

None!  Retrospective observational analyses are not intended for direct comparison and are only designed to evaluate associations among variables.

There are no results from DOAC vs DOAC head-to-head clinical trials.

600

In Amplify the RRR for Eliquis vs Enoxaparin/Warfarin in major bleeding events was what percentage?

69%

600

Patients with these types of insurance were evaluated in the Jin study

Commercially insured and Medicare Advantage Plans