Intro
Methods
Results
Discussion
100

What question did you ask in your project?

Is bark depth (of honey locust trees) a factor influenced by air pollution?

100

What data did you collect?

Collected the bark depth and trunk diameter of 15 urban and 15 rural trees (30 total)

100

What did you find?

Urban bark depth averaged 1.45cm, and rural: 0.96cm

100

What do the results show?

Urban bark depth is consistently thicker than rural bark depth

200

Why did you ask your question?

To expand the idea of air pollution's impact on plants/trees

200

How did you collect your data?

Used a bark gauge and tree tape measurer

200

Is there a relationship between bark depth and trunk diameter?

Yes – they are positively correlated

200

What do the results mean?

Pollution DOES have an impact on bark depth

300

What was your hypothesis?

Air pollution selects for thicker bark – urban trees would have thicker bark than rural trees

300

What tests did you use?

T-test between urban and rural & linear regression between bark depth and trunk diameter

300

How did you analyze bark depth without trunk diameter's influence?

Analyzed the residuals from the linear regression test

300

Why does this matter?

Proves how air pollution selects for thicker trees – natural selection by environmental factors