Types of Research Questions
Causal Effects
Randomized Experiments
Observational Studies
100

What is the proportion of adults, aged 18-39 years across race/ethnic groups in the US, who are being treated for hypertension in 2023?

Descriptive

100

What is the framework called for estimating a causal effect?

Potential outcomes or counterfactual outcomes

100

This causal identification condition describes when there is statistical independence between the potential outcomes and the treatment/action under study, or when treatment status is randomized, which group of participants received the treatment is irrelevant.

Exchangeability

100

This identifiability condition notes the probability of receiving every level of treatment is positive for every individual. This means that there is no individual for whom receiving the treatment is impossible (and vice versa for the control)

positivity

200

In adults aged 18-39 years who are being treated for depression, what is the effect of adding on an outdoor walking intervention (30 minutes a day) to standard care on depressive symptoms after 6 months?

Causal

200

This identifiability condition says that among people who were exposed, the effect of the exposure is no different than it would have been if they had been assigned that exposure/treatment/intervention (same goes for being unexposed/untreated/no intervention)

Exchangeability

200

This approach to randomization describes when an investigator uses several randomization probabilities that depend (are conditional) on the values of prognostic factor(s) (L)

Conditional randomization

200

When looking to estimate a causal effect from observational data, this identifiability condition can be best described as “a well defined intervention”.

consistency

300

What is the association between higher levels of vegetable intake compared to little/no vegetable intake with risk for colon cancer?

Association

300

“Blank” is defined by a different risk in two disjoint subsets of the population determined by the individuals’ actual treatment value (A = 1 or A = 0), whereas causation is defined by a different risk in the same population under two different treatment values (a = 1 or a = 0)

Association

300

This analytic approach describes effect is the effect of treatment assignment (or allocation)

Intent to treat

300

This framework describes an approach to formulating a causal question from observational data?

target trial framework

400

What sociodemographic factors most strongly predict being screened for type 2 diabetes in adults in Kaiser Permanente Health?

Predictive

400

What is the fundamental challenge of estimating a causal effect?

Always missing half the data

400

Investigators undertake this analysis when the goal is to estimate the causal effect that would have been observed if all patients had adhered to the protocol of the RCT

per protocol

400

Final jeopardy: An analytic approach that provides the best framework for a valid estimate in observational data aligns what following 3 elements?

Eligibility, Time zero, treatment/exposure assignment (non prevalent or non delayed)