Federalist 10
An essay written in favor of the constitution describing how a large government would prevent the creation of factions because when there are more representatives elected, there will be a greater number of opinions.
-Yoder wanted to pull their kids out of school due to religious freedoms but was denied so Yoder filed suit.
Shaw V Reno
1st amendment: equal protection clause
Judicial review
A power used to check the constitutionality of laws.
Brutis 1
This document warned against the constitution as a big government would have too much power due to the supremacy clause, necessary and proper clause, and taxation
Schenck V United States
New york times V US
First amendment: Freedom of the press
Lobbying
When interest groups use their influence to effect the government
Federalist 51
Brown vs Board of education
An African American family wants to attend a white only school due to the poor conditions and far distance of their current schooling but are denied so they file suit against the board of education.
Gideon V Wainwright
6th amendment: Right to legal counsel
or
14th amendment: Equal Protection Clause
Iron Triangle
Federalist 70
A document written in support of the constitution that argues that a unitary executive (one president) is needed to allow for accountability of the government and enable the president to defend against legislative intrusions on his power.
engle v vitale
Kids in school were required to do a daily prayer, but the families along with the kids did not want to do so.
The families would file suit against the school district's representative named vitale.
McDonald V Chicago
2nd amendment: right to bear arms
or
14th amendment: Due Process Clause
Supply-side economics
Federalist 78
A document written in favor of the constitution that describes the process of judicial review, in which the federal courts review statutes to determine whether they are consistent with the Constitution and its statutes
Marrbury v maddison
William Marbury had been appointed Justice of the Peace in the District of Columbia, but his commission was not delivered. Joined by three other similarly situated appointees, he petitioned for a writ of mandamus compelling the delivery of the commissions.
Tinker V Des Moines
1st amendment: freedom to exercise religion
Exclusionary Rule
Evidence found in violation of the 4th amendment cannot be used in a trial as evidence.