Reasons to stop
Reasons to book
Case Law
100

Expired/ No registration

41-1a-201

100

Possession of a controlled substance schedule I/II/Analog

58-37-8(2)(B)(II)

Class A

100

The Supreme Court held that police officers cannot prolong a traffic stop to conduct a dog-sniffing drug search. 


Rodriguez v. United States

200

Failure to change lanes/slow down for stationary emerg. vehicle with lights on.

41-6a-904(2)

200

False personal info to police (providing personal info of another actual person)

76-8-507(2b)

200

Allows law enforcement to search a readily mobile vehicle without a warrant if they have probable cause to believe it contains contraband or evidence. 

Carroll v. United States

300

Failure to operate in a single lane.

41-6A-710(1)(A)

300

Possession of stolen credit card

76-6-506.3

300

Supreme Court case that created the "stop and frisk" legal standard, allowing police to briefly detain (stop) and pat down (frisk) individuals for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion, that the person is involved in criminal activity and armed.

Terry V. Ohio 

400

White light to the rear.

41-6a-1612

400

Vehicle compartments for contraband

76-9-1902

400

Established that police use of force must be evaluated under the Fourth Amendment's "objective reasonableness" standard.

Graham v. Connor

500

Plate-Frame affects readability.

41-1a-403(2B)

500

Burglary of a vehicle 

76-6-204

500

Court held that the use of a drug-sniffing police dog during a routine traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, even if the initial infraction is unrelated to drug offenses

Illinois v. Caballes