Show:
Styles Part 1
Styles Cont.
Observations
Observations Cont.
100

This was one of Carnegie's Elements the Central Valley School District utilized.

Appreciation. 

100

This was the Groups method to measure their success.

Meeting effectiveness.

100

The Spokane City Legislator was storming. This is one of the what?

Phases of Development. 

100

The CVSD moved through their meeting efficiently and effectively. This demonstrated effective _________.

Organization

200
At the Spokane city meeting we noticed this type of Conflict management style.

Avoidance. 

200

This was the communication style we observed at the Spokane City Legislative Session.

Aggressive.

200

We could tell by watching exactly what the group dynamic was with the CVSD. What does this mean?

They have a prevalent group dynamic.

200
More communication, understanding, descriptive feedback, and conflict resolution are four things we recognized as __________?

Improvements

300

The Central Valley SD recognized and leveraged the reality of equifinality in this process. 

Decision Making / Problem Solving 

300

Spokane City Legislative has a clear leadership style. What does this mean?

They had a prevalent Leadership Style.

300

Level of Safety at the meeting with the Spokane City was _____.

Enough.
300

This were clearly defined at both meetings we attended. 

Roles

400
The Central Valley School District has a high level of ______. This aided in bringing a wide array of perspectives to the group.

Diversity

400

If we say no one farted at the meeting this would be considered a what?

A Norm.

400

Everyone at the CVSD meeting was throwing out ideas to solve a problem that were random, but received well. This is an example of what?

Openness to Creativity / Out-of-the-box thinking

400

The knowledge we gained from interviewing members/leaders. 

New perspectives.