Statement or not....
Non-Hearsay Purpose
Prior Statements 801(d)(1)
Opposing-party Statements 801(d)(2)
Hearsay Exceptions (803-807)
100

A surveillance camera logs the defendant’s entry at 8:31 p.m.


Answer: Not hearsay — machines cannot be declarants.

100

Victim told officer, “He threatened to burn my house down,” offered to prove defendant committed extortion.


Not hearsay — the threat is a legally operative verbal act. It's admissible because it's offered for its legal effect, not the truth of its content (e.g., proving a contract was offered, not that the price was accurate). 

100

At trial, witness cannot remember robber’s face. Prosecution introduces prior lineup identification.

Not hearsay — 801(d)(1)(C) prior identification.

100

Defendant told friend, “I shouldn’t have swung the bat so hard.” Prosecution offers the statement.

Not hearsay — 801(d)(2)(A) party’s own statement.

100

Bystander immediately says, “That red car is speeding straight into the crosswalk!”

803(1) Present sense impression.

200

A dog barks at the door when officers arrive; prosecutor offers barking to show someone was inside.

Not hearsay - animals cannot make 'statements.'

200

Tenant tells landlord, “There’s mold everywhere!” offered to prove landlord had notice.

Not hearsay — effect on listener (notice).

200

Witness testified at a grand jury that defendant fired first. At trial, the witness says, “I’m not sure.” Prosecution offers grand-jury transcript.

Not hearsay — 801(d)(1)(A) prior inconsistent statement under oath.

200

Co-defendant texts, “Meet at 9 to pick up the stolen goods,” during the ongoing conspiracy.

Not hearsay — 801(d)(2)(E) co-conspirator, during and in furtherance.

200

Right after being stabbed, victim screams, “He’s still here — he stabbed me!”

803(2) Excited utterance.

300

A man puts his hands up and kneels when police yell “Freeze!” Prosecution offers this to show consciousness of guilt.

Not hearsay — nonassertive conduct.

300

Customer complains, “This dish tastes like bleach,” offered to prove restaurant knew of dangerous conditions.

Not hearsay — effect on listener.

300

Defendant accuses witness of fabricating story after being promised money. Prosecution introduces witness’s same-story statement made before any alleged motive.

Not hearsay — 801(d)(1)(B)(i) prior consistent statement.

300

Store manager says, “We know the floor is dangerously slippery,” and plaintiff sues the store.

Not hearsay — 801(d)(2)(D) employee/agent statement.

300

Patient tells ER doctor, “It hurts below my ribs when I breathe.”

803(4) Statement for medical diagnosis/treatment.

400

A child nods “yes” when asked, “Did Daddy hit you?”

Hearsay — intended assertive nonverbal conduct.

400

Defendant’s diary says, “I hate my boss,” offered to prove motive in a workplace assault.

Not hearsay — circumstantial evidence of state of mind, not offered as truth.

400

Witness has their credibility attacked because of poor memory. Prosecution introduces prior recorded statement showing consistent recollection.

Not hearsay — 801(d)(1)(B)(ii) rehabilitation.

400

Defendant remains silent when accused in front of police: “You stole the jewelry with me!”

Not hearsay if circumstances support adoptive admission.

400

Business regularly keeps digital logs showing all outgoing shipments; plaintiff offers them.

803(6) Business records.

500

Neighbors testify that all the cars on the street had their headlights on, offered to prove it was dark out.

Not hearsay — conduct not intended as an assertion.

500

A sign on a door reads “Employees Only,” offered to show defendant knew he shouldn’t enter.

Not hearsay — legally operative directive, not truth-assertive.

500

Witness gives prior identification of getaway driver but is now hostile. Defense claims the identification is hearsay.

Not hearsay — 801(d)(1)(C).

500

Corporate spokesperson says, “Our company takes full responsibility for the spill.”

Not hearsay — 801(d)(2)(C) authorized statement.

500

Declarant unavailable. In a sworn deposition, she previously testified about defective brakes. Offered now against the same party who had a chance to cross her earlier.

804(b)(1) Former testimony.