The Nature and Development of Science
Philosophical Foundations: Bacon, Descartes and Montaigne
Popper and Kuhn: How Does Science Develop?
Scientific Rationality: Stepin's Three Types
The Structure and Levels of Scientific Knowledge: Chalmers
100

What is science?

Systematic production of knowledge

100

Who wrote The New Organon?

Francis Bacon

100

Who introduced the concept of falsifiability?

Karl Popper

100

What are the three types of scientific rationality identified by Vladimir Stepin?

Classical, non-classical, post-non-classical

100

What are the two main levels of scientific knowledge?

Empirical and theoretical

200

What is the main difference between scientific knowledge and everyday knowledge?

Evidence-based vs everyday experience

200

What is the difference between empiricism and rationalism?

Experience vs reason

200

What does falsifiability mean?

A theory must be testable and potentially refutable

200
What is the main characteristic of classical science?

Objectivity and determinism

200

What is the difference between empirical and theoretical knowledge?

Evidence vs explanation

300

How did Ancient Greek thinkers contribute to the development of scientific thinking?

Rational inquiry and logical reasoning

300

What is Francis Bacon's main contribution to scientific methodology?

Induction, observation and experimentation

300

What is a scientific paradigm according to Thomas Kuhn?

Shared scientific framework

300

How does non-classical science differ from classical science?

Role of observer and instruments

300

What is the difference between a concept, a hypothesis and a theory?

Idea, testable proposition, systematic explanation

400

How did the Scientific Revolution change the way people understood nature?

Observation, experimentation and new scientific methods

400

How did Descartes use methodical doubt to establish reliable knowledge?

Doubt, reason and deduction

400

What is the difference between normal science and a scientific revolution?

Normal research vs paradigm change

400

How does the understanding of an object of study differ in classical, non-classical, and post-non-classical science?

Expected answer:

  • Classical science: the object is studied independently of the researcher; the influence of the observer is excluded.

  • Non-classical science: the role of the researcher, instruments and methods of observation is taken into account.

  • Post-non-classical science: the object is understood as a complex, self-developing system; the relationship between scientific knowledge, human values and social goals is considered.

400

Why does Chalmers argue that observation is not always neutral?

Theory influences observation

500

Can scientific knowledge ever be completely objective? Explain your position.

No, observations and interpretations can be influenced by assumptions

500

Descartes argues that reliable knowledge must begin with doubt. What is the role of methodical doubt in his philosophy, and how does he arrive at the idea that the thinking self exists?

Descartes uses systematic doubt to question all beliefs that could be false. He arrives at Cogito, ergo sum (I think, therefore I am): even if he doubts everything, the act of doubting proves that he exists as a thinking being.

500

According to Kuhn, what happens when anomalies accumulate and a scientific paradigm enters a crisis? Explain the process leading to a scientific revolution.

Anomalies challenge the existing paradigm. When they accumulate and cannot be adequately explained, a crisis develops. A new paradigm may emerge, replace the old one and transform scientific practice.

500

A researcher studies climate change, human behaviour and environmental policy as an interconnected system. Which type of scientific rationality is most relevant, and why?

Post-non-classical rationality

500

A researcher interviews 30 migrants and discovers that some experience social exclusion. Explain how the researcher can move from empirical observations to a theoretical explanation.

Data → concepts → hypothesis → theoretical explanation