Thinking – German Expansion (Move to Global War)
Thinking – Cold War
Thinking – Authoritarian States (Hitler, Stalin, Mao)
Thinking – History of the Americas
SYNTHESIS – Cross-Topic Thinking
100

This argument prioritizes economic pressures, such as the need for resources and recovery from the Great Depression, in explaining German expansion.

What is an economic causation argument for German expansion?

100

This interpretation argues that Soviet expansionism was the primary cause of the Cold War.

What is the Orthodox interpretation?

100

This argument emphasizes economic instability as the primary factor in the rise of authoritarian leaders.

 What is an economic causation argument for the rise of authoritarian states?


100

This argument emphasizes Enlightenment ideology as the main cause of independence movements.

hat is an ideological causation argument for independence movements?

100

This similarity links German and Japanese expansion as driven by dissatisfaction with the post-WWI order.

What is shared resentment of the Treaty system / interwar settlement?

200

This interpretation emphasizes Hitler’s long-term ideological goals, including Lebensraum, as the primary driver of expansion.

What is an ideological causation argument (intentionalist view)?

200

This interpretation places responsibility on US economic expansion and containment policies.

What is the Revisionist interpretation?


200

This argument highlights ideology and charismatic leadership as the key drivers of authoritarian rule.

What is an ideological/leadership causation argument?

200

This argument prioritizes economic grievances over political ideals in explaining revolution.

What is an economic causation argument for independence movements?


200

This comparison links Cold War tensions and pre-WWII diplomacy failures.

What is failure of diplomacy and mistrust between powers?


300

This perspective suggests expansion was opportunistic, reacting to international weakness rather than following a fixed plan.

What is a functionalist interpretation of German expansion?


300

This interpretation argues that both superpowers contributed to rising tensions.

 What is the Post-revisionist interpretation?


300

This comparison evaluates how propaganda was used similarly by Hitler and Stalin to consolidate power.

What is a comparative analysis of propaganda in authoritarian states?


300

This comparison evaluates why the Haitian Revolution led to greater social change than the American Revolution.

What is a comparison of social outcomes in independence movements?

$

300

This concept explains how authoritarian states and imperial powers both relied on propaganda to justify actions.

What is use of propaganda to legitimize power and policy?


400

This evaluation weighs the role of appeasement against Hitler’s ambitions in causing WWII.

What is an evaluation of relative importance of causes (appeasement vs ideology)?

400

This evaluation weighs ideology against security concerns in explaining the origins of the Cold War.

What is an evaluation of ideological vs security causes?


400

This evaluation weighs coercion versus consent in maintaining authoritarian control.

What is an evaluation of methods of control (force vs popular support)?

400

This evaluation considers whether slavery was the main cause of the American Civil War.

 What is an evaluation of the causes of the Civil War (slavery vs other factors)?


400

This evaluation links Reconstruction failures to long-term political and social divisions in the US.

What is an analysis of long-term consequences?

500

This argument claims that German expansion marked a turning point in the collapse of the interwar international system.

What is an argument of historical significance (collapse of collective security)?

500

This argument suggests the Cuban Missile Crisis was a success for both superpowers despite its risks.

What is an evaluation of the Cuban Missile Crisis as a mutual diplomatic success?

500

This argument assesses whether Mao’s domestic policies were more transformative than Stalin’s.

What is an evaluation of comparative impact of policies (Mao vs Stalin)?

500

This argument assesses whether US expansion into global affairs was driven more by economic or strategic motives.

What is an evaluation of causes of US imperialism (economic vs strategic)?

500

This argument connects independence movements, authoritarian states, and Cold War conflicts through struggles over power and ideology.

What is a thematic synthesis of power and ideology across periods?