Bias
Change
Causality
Measurement
Perspective
100

The idea that relying solely on university undergraduates in both studies creates this type of issue.

What is sampling bias/generalizability bias

100

This term describes the process of psychological and cultural change an individual undergoes when adopting host culture norms.

What is acculturation

100

Because both studies use non-experimental designs, researchers cannot claim strict cause-and-effect, only this type of relationship

What is a correlation (or association)

100

Levine et al. measured participant views across 11 countries using this single forced-choice question.

What is "Would you marry someone if you were not in love with them?"

100

Only 4% of participants from the USA agreed to marry without love, reflecting this cultural perspective.

What is individualism

200

Participants adjusting their survey answers to seem more open or traditional to the researcher is known as this bias.

What is social desirability bias

200

Comparing Levine et al.'s findings across nations differing in cultural dimensions suggests that love's role in marriage changes as a country shifts toward which cultural dimension?

What is individualism

200

Levine et al. concluded that this cultural dimension is a major indicator of varying views on love in marriage.

What is individualism versus collectivism

200

Uskul et al. measured cultural adoption using self-report surveys called these scales.

What are acculturation scales

200

Up to 50% of participants from Pakistan agreed they would marry without love, reflecting this cultural perspective

What is collectivism

300

When researchers evaluate collectivistic marriage practices through an individualistic lens, they commit this bias.

What is ethnocentrism (or cultural bias)

300

The difference in attitudes toward interracial dating between Chinese Canadian parents and their children demonstrates this type of societal change over time.

What is intergenerational change (or a generational gap)

300

Because both studies measured participants at a single point in time, what research design limitation prevents them from demonstrating how cultural values directly cause changes in behavior over time

What is a cross-sectional design (lack of longitudinal data)

300

Uskul et al. measured attitudes towards interracial dating by having participants rate their support for characters in a hypothetical scenario depicting this.  

What is a parent-child conflict

300

Uskul et al. linked differing perspectives on interracial dating to this core IB sociocultural framework.

What is Social Identity Theory

400

When the sample is disproportionately drawn from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic societies, often abbreviated as this term.

What is a WEIRD sample

400

Generationally, young adults in Uskul et al. showed a shift away from traditional parental authority due to exposure to this host nation's culture.

What is Canadian culture

400

What third variable (confound) associated with individualistic nations might actually be causing the higher emphasis on romantic love rather than cultural values alone

What is economic development / wealth (or industrialization/education)

400

The total sample size measured across 11 nations in the Levine et al. study.

What is 1,170 participants (497 males, 673 females)

400

Levine et al. compared marriage views across 11 different nations using the same standard question, representing which type of approach to cross-cultural research? Hint: a 4 letter-word.

What is an etic approach

500

When researchers unintentionally interpret participant scenario ratings or survey answers in a way that confirms their pre-existing hypotheses about cultural differences.

What is researcher bias (or confirmation bias)

500

As Chinese Canadian participants increased their identification with Canadian culture, this changed regarding interracial dating

What is becoming more open / favorable toward it

500

In Uskul et al., host culture adoption and open attitudes toward interracial dating are linked, but why doesn't this prove acculturation causes open dating attitudes?

What is the possibility of reverse causality (or bidirectional ambiguity, e.g., already open people choose to acculturate more)

500

Asking participants to rate hypothetical scenario responses may fail to measure genuine, real-world relationship decisions, threatening this type of measurement validity

What is construct validity

500

From this perspective, choosing a partner from an out-group is advantageous because it increases genetic diversity and avoids inbreeding

What is an evolutionary (or biological) perspective