2021 Divorce Act Changes
Family Violence & Parenting Decisions
Bill C-92 (Indigenous Child & Family Services)
Parenting Orders & Contact Orders
Divorce Act 1968 & 1985
100

What principle must guide all parenting decisions under the amended Divorce Act?

The best interests of the child.

100

Give one example of emotional or psychological abuse courts must consider.

Gaslighting, degrading comments, threats, intimidation, etc.  

100

What major power does Bill C-92 give to Indigenous Nations?

Authority to run their own child and family services.

100

Who are contact orders for?

Non-parents (e.g., grandparents).

200

What two old terms were replaced by parenting time and decision-making responsibility?

Custody and access.

200

What type of behaviour involves monitoring, isolating, controlling, or threatening a partner?

Coercive control.

200

When Indigenous law conflicts with provincial law, whose law prevails?

Indigenous law.

200

What do parenting orders assign?

Decision-making responsibility and parenting time.

200

One major criticism of the 1968 Act was that it trapped people in unsafe marriages. Why?

One major criticism of the 1968 Act was that it trapped people in unsafe marriages. Why?

300

True or False: The amendments require judges to consider family violence even if the child was not directly harmed.

True

300

Should parenting time be restricted even when violence wasn’t directed at the child?

Yes, exposure counts.

300

What historical harms is Bill C-92 a response to?

Residential schools, Sixties Scoop, birth alerts, overrepresentation in foster care, etc.

300

What problem were the new terms trying to fix?

The idea that parents “win” or “lose” custody.

300

What major shift did the 1985 Divorce Act create in terms of divorce grounds?

It introduced no-fault divorce (one-year separation).  

400

Name one factor judges must consider when determining the impact of family violence.

Severity, frequency, pattern, coercive control, child’s exposure, risk of future harm, etc.

400

What is one reason courts treat coercive control as dangerous as physical violence?

It predicts future physical harm, traps victims, harms children emotionally, etc.

400

What concept is now a legal right for Indigenous children?

Cultural continuity.

500

Why did lawmakers change the old terminology?

To shift focus from parental rights and “winning custody” to child-focused responsibilities.

500

True or False: Courts can order supervised visits when family violence is suspected but not proven.

True — they can act to prevent risk.

500

What can courts order when a parent poses a risk but the relationship should not be severed?

Supervised parenting time.