Statutory Interpretation
Statutory Interpretation
Administrative governance
Rulemaking
Adjudication
100

What are the common statutory tools used to prove the meaning of a text?

1. Original meaning

2. legislative history

3. Legislative intent

4. Canons

100

What is the basic principle underlying statutory interpretation?

Legislative supremacy — courts are to faithfully interpret and apply statutes as written.

100

What are the key task of an agency?

Rulemaking

Adjudication

Regulation (broad and narrow)

100

what is formal rulemaking vs informal rulemaking

Formal rulemaking is required only when a statute specifies rules must be made “on the record after opportunity for agency hearing” and involves trial-like procedures (witnesses, cross-examination).

Informal rulemaking (APA §553) is notice-and-comment rulemaking: the agency publishes a proposed rule, allows public comment, and issues a final rule with a concise general statement of basis and purpose.

100

What is adjudication? 

  • “adjudication” means agency process for the formulation of an order
  • typically involve the retrospective application of existing law to specific fact patterns.

Adjudication is the agency process for issuing orders that apply law to specific individuals or entities, similar to court decisions.


200

How do you determine if the term has an ordinary meaning or scientific meaning?

unless otherwise defined, words should be interpreted as their ordinary, contemporary, common meaning particular to the context of the community the law targets

200

What is the rule regarding absurd results?

Courts should not construe statutes to produce absurd results — outcomes that contradict deeply held societal values.

200

When does procedural due process apply?

often applies to: state/local adjudication and informal agency adjudication

Rarely applies to: Rulemaking, policy statements, and formal federal adjudication 

200

What is the logical outgrowth test?

Final rules must be a logical outgrowth of the proposed rule; agencies cannot impose new obligations without fair notice.

200

What is the process for appealing agency decisions? What are the steps

1. initial agency decision

2. Appeal w/in agency

2.5 Exhaustion doctrine

- procedural: must take advantage of all agency procedure before judicial review

-issue: can't sue if agency didn't get a chance to confront the issue

3. Judicial review

300
What is the major difference btw federal and california interpretation tools?

CA focuses more on the text and will only use legislative history if the textual tools don't lead to clarity

300

What is the canon against surplusage/redundancy? 

What is the Canon of consistent use?

A statute should be read to avoid redundancy or so that each word or phrase has some meaning and function

When a statute repeatedly uses a word or phrase that word or phrase likely has consistent meaning throughout the statute 


300

When can congress delegate authority in CA?

1) Newson → delegation upheld as const. bc sufficient Standards/Safeguard existed to guide executive action toward a coordinated emergency Response

2) Warren v. Marion County→ broad delegation

Permissible if there are procedural Safeguards to protect individual rights (process/procedural protection)


300

What is the basic rule making process?

The basic process: 

1) Advance notice of proposed rulemaking – OPTIONAL

2) Proposed Rule – GIVING NOTICE

3) Comment period – PUBLIC OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT

- Respond to significant comments and disclose the basis of the rule.

4) Final rule – EXPLANATION

a. Agency needs to provide a concise, general statement of reasons why it adopted rule that it did


300

How is formal adjudication different from informal adjudication?

Formal adjudication is required when a statute mandates a hearing “on the record after opportunity for agency hearing” and involves trial-like procedures (e.g., ALJ, evidence, testimony, cross-examination). 

Informal adjudication has no specific procedural requirements under the APA; the process is more flexible, often involving letters, interviews, or paper reviews without formal hearings.

400

What are the substantive canons?

1. Rule of lenity 

  • When criminal statute is ambiguous should be construed in favor of D

2. Canon of constitutional avoidance

  • If there are two alternative bases for deciding a case, and one is constitutional and the other is not, the court should decide the case on the non-constitutional base
  • If there are two alternative bases for deciding a case, and one is constitutional and the other is not, the court should chose the interpretation that avoids the constitutional issue

3. Federalism canon/Canon of avoiding interference with traditional state authority

4. Major question doctrine

400

What is ejusdem generis? What is noscitur a sociis?

When a statute includes a list and the list contains a general or catch-all term that general or catch-all term will take its meaning from the theme of the other words


A word or phrase will take its meaning from surrounding words

400

When can congress delegate? (Fed)


  1. Whitman → congress can delegate if provides intelligible Principle
  2. Gorsuch dissent (Gundy) → 3 reasons 1) detail filling 2) Executive fact-finding 3) Assignment of non-leg. activity
400

What are the TRAC factors? What do they do?

Used to determine if agency responds in a reasonable time:

1. response time subject to "rule of reason"

2. Congressional timetables

3. Delays less allowed when health and safty at stake 

4. Effect of expediting action on competing agency priorities

5. Nature and gravity of interest prejudiced

400

What standard of review applies to formal adjudication fact-finding?

Substantial evidence review — requires that findings be supported by relevant evidence a reasonable mind might accept as adequate.

500

What is the major questions doctrine?

When an agency claims broad regulatory power over issues of great economic/political significance, courts require clear congressional authorization.


500

 What are the key types of legislative history?

Committee reports (most persuasive), sponsor statements, floor debates, hearing testimony, amendments.


500

What is the test for procedural due process?

  1. Was there government action?

  2. Was a liberty/property interest at stake?

  3. Was there individualized decision-making?

  4. Was there a neutral decision-maker?

  5. Is Mathews test satisfied?

- Private interest affected

- Risk of erroneous deprivation and value of more process

- Government’s interest in efficiency/cost

500

How do you determine if its a policy statement or interpretive rule? Are they forms of rulemaking?

How to know if it is a policy statement: 

- Order contains statement of policy

- Memos, letters, speeches, etc that describe agency’s intentions for future

- Opportunity “will be” afforded to interested parties

- Procedures should be adopted

- Hint: will use future tense in language, talks about future plans, will reserve some discretion for future decision making

An interpretive rule 

- clarifies the meaning of some other existing law (like a statute or a regulation) but does not itself establish binding law

  • Interpretive rules and general statements of policy do not require Notice and Comment

IR test: would there be a legal basis for enforcement without the rule, did agency publish rule in CFR, did agency explicitly invoke legislative authority, or did rule amend existing rule

NO policy statements and interpretive rules do not make binding laws


500

What is the rule for individualized adjudication?

Due process requires a hearing when government action involves individualized decision-making that affects a specific person or small group (Londoner); no hearing is required for generalized rulemaking or broad policy decisions (Bi-Metallic).