About Sir John Suckling
“Song” Basics
Themes and Messages
Tone and Literary Devices
Meaning and Interpretation
100

Who was Sir John Suckling?

An English poet during the 17th century 

100

Who is the speaker addressing in the poem?

A lovesick lover.

100

What major theme appears in the poem?

Unrequited love.

100

What is the tone of the poem?

Mocking and sarcastic.

100

How does the speaker believe love should be approached

With confidence and self respect.

200

 Besides poetry, what other role did John have?

He was a courtier and soldier.

200

What is the speaker’s main message to the lover?

Stop wasting time on someone who doesn’t love you back.

200

What does the poem suggest about chasing love too hard?

It’s pointless and humiliating.

200

What literary devices are used in the poem?

Rhetorical questions, Irony, and Repetition

200

Why does the speaker call the lover “fond”?  

To demonstrate the lover is foolishly obsessed.

300

What English king did John serve under?

King Charles I

300

What emotion does the poem mostly express?

Frustration, and or sarcasm.

300

How does the speaker view romantic suffering?

As unnecessary and foolish.

300

How does repetition help the poem?

It emphasizes the lover’s desperation.

300

What is john's solution to the lover’s problem?

Move on and don't obsess.

400

What group of poets is John associated with?

The Cavalier poets.

400

What type of poem is “Song”?

A lyrical love poem.

400

Overall, what attitude toward love does the poem show?

Realistic and sometimes confusing.

400

What device is used when the speaker exaggerates suffering?

Hyperbole.

400

What lesson does this poem teach?

Love shouldn't come at the cost of your self worth.

500

During which historical period did John write?

The Cavalier era.

500

What is the full title of the poem?

“Why so pale and wan, fond lover?”

500

What advice does the poem give about self respect?

Don’t lose your dignity over someone who doesn’t care.

500

Why does John use humor in the poem?

To criticize unhealthy romantic behavior.

500

How does the poem challenge traditional love poetry?

It mocks romantic suffering instead of glorifying it (like everyone else..).