Gemora
What do the עדים זוממין in the משנה get as a punishment?
makkos
According to רש"י in the case of the עדים זוממין testifying that this person was a בן גרושה, which tribe where the עדים זוממין from?
כהנים
How does תוס first answer how the עדים can make someone חייב גלות if he can claim it was במזיד?
there was רגלים לדבר so we can assume it was שוגג?
How does תוס explain what it means מקדימין לאומה מיתה?
that if we can't give them that punishment then we give them a different one
What is the גמרא's answer to its first 2 questions?
our משנה is a continuation of the last משנה in סנהדרין which talks about not regular cases of עדים זוממין?
How are the עדים claiming how they know that this person is a בן גרושה?
they saw his mother got divorced
Why did our משנה specifically discuss testifying that this person is a בן גרושה and not a case like ממזר
since this משנה is a continuation of the last משנה in סנהדרין which also has to do with כהנים
Why don't we make the עדים זוממין a מצרי שני if they are trying to testify that about a person?
since then we would also be punishing his wife and we only punish him
Simply, what are the 2 (first) questions of the גמרא on the משנה?
It should have said כיצד העדים נעשים זוממין
In a later משנה it explains how they become עדים זוממין
How does רש"י explain why our משנה should seemingly say כיצד אין העדים נעשין זוממין?
since they are not getting כאשר זמם
What is תוס's second answer to how the עדים can make someone חייב גלות if he can claim it was במזיד AND how is it different than the חלב case?
here he was quiet but in the חלב case he denied it so we can say it means that he didn't do it בשוגג rather במזיד
How does תוס explain why we need the מיעוט of היא even though we have אחיו
to teach that the עדים זוממים don't get שריפה even if the man would not be getting punished
What question does the גמרא have on the first answer of how we know that the עדים in our משנה get מלקות AND what is the גמרא's answer?
Why don't we just make the עדים a חלל and not their kids? Since we need their punishment to be the same as they were trying for him to get
How does רש"י explain what it means המחלל אינו מתחלל?
A כהן who marries a גרושה his kids become חללים but not him
How does תוס ask/explain why seemingly if עדים testify that someone is a בן גרושהnevertheless their עדות shouldn't count AND how does he first answer this question?
since it is עדות שאי אתה יכול להזימה since they won't get the punishment they are trying to give. He answers that since they are getting מלקות it is like they are getting כאשר זמם
How does תוס explain the ק"ן of ומה הסוקל
if someone stones someone they don't get stoned so עדים זוממין who only tried to get someone stoned shouldn't get stoned
What is the exact words of the גמרא's question on בר פדא's answer?
you will then be בטל תורת עדים זוממין since ומה הסוקל אינו נסקל הבא לסקל ואינו סקל אוני דין שלו יסקל
How does רש"י explain the גמרא's answer? What is the general case that the last משנה in סנהדרין is discussing and what is the general case that our משנה is discussing?
What is תוס's question from גמרא of נערה המאורסה?
Why is their testimony not good since they can't get מיתה since they can claim that they were just trying to make אסור to husband if seemingly they can still get מלקות?
What is תוס's second question on רש"י's explanation of ומה הסוקל?
that second ק"ו we wouldn't make since it goes against the פסוק of כאשר זמם unlike the first ק"ו so therefore it is not a question