Dalālah.
Mufrad/Murakkab
Tasawwurat
Tasdiqat
Bonus
100

Word for Word English Translation of Dalālah

“ A thing being such the knowledge of it necessitates knowledge of something else”

100

Are the following Mufrad or Murakkab?

1. عبد الملك

2. Darrusalam 

3. Zayd 

1. Mufrad 

2. Mufrad

3. Mufrad

100

Meaning denoted through words are of two types 

1. Kulli 

2. Juz’i 

100

The maḥṣūrāt al-arbaʿah are? 

A”, “E”, “I”, and “O”

100

What is Logic?

Mantiq is a science that enables accurate, clear, and effective thinking 

200

Word for Word Arabic Translation of Dalālah 

‏كون الشيء بحيث يلزم من العلم به العلم بشيء آخر

200

Define in Arabic    ‏مفرد       ‏مركب

- ما لا يراد بالجزء منه دلالة على جزء المعنى 

- ما يراد بالجزء منه دلالة على جزء المعنى

200

What are the Al-Kulliyyāt Al-Khams

Dhati, Aradi, Jins, Naw’, Fasl 

200

Give an example of Qadaya Shakhsiyyah and Qadaya Muhmalah

1. Zayd is a human 

2. Humans are good 

200

What are the Four Nisab Bayn Al-Kulliyyan

Tasawi, Tabayun, Umum Mutlaq, Umum Wajhi 

300

How many types of dalālah are there? Which one do we focus on and why?

There are six types of dalālah 

We focus on dalālah lafẓiyyah waḍʿiyyah, as it is the most effective way of communicating concepts from one’s mind to another person


300

A word referring to only one coined meaning is of __ types, 

And they are 

1.

2.

3.

3 types 

Alam: specific term that refers to a particular person placing or idea example Zaid 

Mutawati: a word that possesses a single meaning and applies uniformly and equally to all its instances example human

Mushakkik: a word that signifies its meaning differently, depending on what it is describing example existence

300

Four rules of defining

1. The definition must be inclusive and exclusive of all the members of the definiendum

2. The definition must be more evident than the definiendum 

3. The definitions comprehension must be different than the definiendum

4. The definition cannot be contingent upon the definiendum it can’t be circular reasoning

300

When is the Predicate of a categorical proposition undistributed 

Mujibah - when it is an affirmative sentence

300

What is the Difference between Tasawar, Tasdiq and Qiyas

Tasawar: concept/term/word 

Tasdiq: judgment/proposition/sentence

Qiyas: 

Syllogism/paragraph/argument

400

What is the difference between muṭābaqah, taḍammun, and iltizām? Give an example for each in English and Arabic.

Muṭābaqah is when the word used to express the concept indicates to the concept or thing in its entirety

 Taḍammun is when the word used to express the thing indicates to a part of its entity

Iltizām is when something logically bound to the concept is indicated to by the word, Iltizām has no logical limit 

Ex. Muṭābaqah:  إنسان  ←  حيوان ناطق   /  I left the house

Ex. Taḍammun:  إنسان  ←  النطق   /  I locked the house (door)

Ex. Iltizām:  إنسان  ←  قوة الضحك  /  I ate Oberweis (not the building/company; you ate their ice cream or other products)


400

Different types of words coined with multiple meanings 

1. Mushtarak

2. Manqul urfi

3. Manqul shar’i

4. Manqul Istilahi


400

Arabic and English definitions of Jins, Naw’ and Fasl 

‏الجنس هو كلي يحمل على كثيرين مختلفين بالحقائق في جواب ما هو

‏النوع هو كلي يحمل على كثيرين متفقين بل بالحقائق في جواب ما هو

‏الفصل هو كلي يحمل على شيء في جوابي أي شيء هو في ذاته

400

What are the Naqids?

The naqīḍ of  “A” is “O” ; e.g.  كل إنسان حيوان  ←  بعض الإنسان ليس بحيوان

The naqīḍ of  “E” is “I” ; e.g.  لا شيء من الإنسان بحجر  ←  بعض الإنسان حجر

The naqīḍ of  “I” is “E” ; e.g.  بعض الحيوان إنسان  ←  لا شيء من الحيوان بإنسان

The naqīḍ of  “O” is “A” ; e.g.  بعض الحيوان ليس بإنسان  ←  كل حيوان إنسان


400

What are the four stages of the history of logic 

Stage one: transmission and translation

Stage two: Aristotles logic

Stage three: Moving away from Aristotels 

Stage four : glosses and super commentaries

500

Is dalalah in logic inherently intuitive, universal, or cross-cultural?

None of the above. Instead, every word has its own specific signification, and even the signification can vary on context.

500

Do Concomitant Signification (Ilztizamiyyah) have a logical limit? Yes or No and why so? 

They do not have logical limit, they are endless and may vary based upon individual, culture and geographical differences 

500

Example in Arabic for Rasm Tāmm and Rasm Nāqis 

Tāmm: حيوان ذو ضحك

Nāqis: ضحك / ذو ضحك / الماشي النائم

500

What are the aks

The ʿaks of  “A” is “I” ; e.g.  كل إنسان حيوان  ←  بعض الحيوان إنسان

The ʿaks of  “E” is “E” ; e.g.  لا شيء من الإنسان بحجر  ←  لا شيء من الحجر بإنسان

The ʿaks of  “I” is “I” ; e.g.  بعض الحيوان إنسان  ←  بعض الإنسان حيوان

There is no logically consistent ʿaks of  “O” 


500

What is the name of the Book written by Moulana Yusuf Sulaiman Saab 

Minhaj Al-Mantiq