Good- encourages competition (lower price, higher quantity, higher TS), provides more info for consumers (less mistakes in purchases)
Bad- creates barriers to entry (increase price, decrease quantity, lower TS), could mislead consumers (creates mistakes in purchases)
1. firm is not producing at the minimum average total cost (excess capacity)
2. the outcome doesn't maximize net benefit for society because the price exceeds the marginal cost of production (price markup)
service
location
image
Monopoly power is the ability of a firm to charge increase its price without losing all of its customers. This allows firms the ability to charge a price above costs
2nd-beer (single, six pack, case, keg) (pay different prices based on quantity)
3rd- coupons, student discount, senior citizen discount, movie tickets, airline tickets etc (different prices for different groups)
2. government created- against the law to enter (such as patent or contract)
3. natural monopoly- costs and demands are such that only one firm can operate with economic profits greater than or equal to zero. Other firms do not enter because of expected negative profits.
2. charger a greater price due to greater willingness to may
(choose amount of advertising where MC=MB)
Price markup- the marginal benefit exceeds the marginal cost which means net benefit is not maximized
Typical- gov can price regulate (force firms to charge P=MC=D, firm is willing bc profits are >=0); decrease trade barriers (entry occurs, decreasing price an increasing quantity); enforce antitrust laws (objective to make more competitive, increasing TS); or operate the firm itself (optimization problem is maximizing the TS rather than profit)
Natural-gov regulate price (P=ATC=D bc marginal cost pricing results in neg economic profits); could operate firm itself (different objective) CANNOT reduce trade barriers or enforce antitrust laws because each of those depends on having more than one firm in the marker and in natural monopolies, cost and demand are such that only one firm can earn profits greater or equal to zero
Solutions:
1. standardize the product- creates perfectly competitive market, firm-specific demand curves are now horizontal and the LR equilibrium is found where P=MC=ATC.
2. Limit entry and price regulate- limit entry so that firms demand passes through the point where MC=ATC, then price regulate at P=MC=ATC=D.
These solutions create more costs than benefits; 1st eliminates choices to consumers and 2nd eliminates some choices that would be costly to implement
Different consumers and a way to separate them- in order to charge different prices to different consumers, there must be consumers with different willingness to pay and a way to separate them
Prevent resale- if you cannot prevent resale, then a low demand group will buy the product and sell it to a higher demand group, taking some of the profits you hoped you gained
Profit from price discrimination>profits from charging a single price- we assume that firms are profit maximizers, they would choose the profit maximizing strategy (whether same or different prices)
In 1st degree each consumer is charges his/her willingness to pay. Since WTP is unknown and each consumer has an incentive to misrepresent WTP, we fail to see any examples that fit the category perfectly
In monopolistic competition, the product is differentiated and a firm can raise its price and not lose all of its customers. Thus there will be a decrease in quantity demanded (law of demand), but the quantity demanded will not go directly to zero. Since price increases and the FSD decreases, the slope is negative