Relevancy
Competency to Testify
Expert Testimony
Hearsay
Procedure
100

What is the test for relevancy?

Evidence is considered relevant if it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence

The fact is of consequence in determining the action.

100

What is the general definition of the 600 rules?

Whether or not a witness can testify about a certain topic.

100

What is significant about expert testimony?

Experts are able to testify about things they personally didn’t witness but are able to form conclusions based on data they review.

100

Define hearsay

Hearsay is an out-of-court statement being offered for the truth of the matter asserted.

100

To make an objection, what do you do?

Stand up and say "objection your honor"

200

According to rule 403, what kinds of evidence may be relevant may not be admissible? List two kinds.

unfair prejudice

confusing the issues

misleading the jury

undue delay

wasting time

needlessly presenting cumulative evidence

200

Bonus Procedure Question for Double Points

What materials can help you if you need to explain your objection to a Judge?

The Midlands Rules of Evidence


200

Can a lay witness testify to scientific or technical information? Why?

No. That is left to an expert witness who has been qualified in court.

200

Give an Example of an exception to 801 offered through 803

Present Sense Impression

Excited Utterance  

Then-Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition.

Statement Made for Medical Diagnosis or Treatment 

Recorded Recollection

Records of a Regularly Conducted Activity.

Absence of a Record of Regularly Conducted Activity  

Public Records 

Public Records of Vital Statistics 

Absence of a Public Record. 

Records of Religious Organizations Concerning Personal or Family History. 

Certificates of Marriage, Baptism, and Similar Ceremonies. 

Family Records. 

Records of Documents That Affect an Interest in Property.

Statements in Documents That Affect an Interest in Property.

Statements in Ancient Documents. 

Market Reports and Similar Commercial Publications. 

Statements in Learned Treatises, Periodicals, or Pamphlets. 

Reputation Concerning Personal or Family History. 

Reputation Concerning Boundaries or General History

Reputation Concerning Character.  

Judgment of a Previous Conviction 

Judgments Involving Personal, Family, or General History, or a Boundary

200

When can you use leading questions?

On cross examinations

300

Rule 406:  Habit; Routine Practice

Give a definition of the above rule.

If a person does something regularly, the evidence is ALLOWED to show that they conformed with that regular activity at a specific moment.

300

Rule 602 - Need for Personal Knowledge

Give the definition.

A witness may only testify about what they personally know, not what others may or may not know.


300

Can an expert witness base testimony on opinions?

No

300

Name one of the two statement types that are NOT hearsay (not the exceptions)?

For a bonus of 100 points, name both statement types.

(1) A witness’s prior statement is not hearsay if it is being used to impeach the witness
(2) Any statement made by the opposing party is not hearsay, regardless of what the statement is. This only applies to the party representative

300

What does the Judge say when he agrees with the objection?

When he disagrees with an objection?

sustained

overruled

400

Rule 404: Character Evidence

Give the definition of rule 404. For a bonus of 100 points, act out an example of a question that may use improper character evidence.

Evidence that a person does something in general cannot be used that they acted the same way at a specific moment.


Example TBD by team directors.

400

If you are impeaching a witness, do you have to show the witness their affidavit/report/deposition?


If you are impeaching a witness using their affidavit, you DON’T have to show the witness their affidavit, only the opposing attorneys.


400

Bonus Procedure Question for Double Point

What do you do if your question is objected to and the Judge asks you to respond?

Explain why your question should be allowed.

400

803(3): Then-Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition

Define and give an example for 100 bonus points


A statement made by someone describing their own thoughts, emotions, feelings, health, plans, or perception.

400

What do you do if you disagree with the Judge's ruling on your objection?

Sit down


500

Assign one person on your team to act as the attorney and one to act as the witness. Give an example of a question that is more prejudicial than probative.

The correct answer is to be determined by A/B team directors.
500

Rules 603 and 615 are assumed at the beginning of each trial. What are these rules?

You must assign each rule to the correct rule number.

Rule 603 assumes witnesses have been sworn in and must tell the truth.

Rule 615 means all witnesses except for the party representative are sequestered. This means they do not hear the testimony of the other witnesses.

500

Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

Name two of the four qualifications of an expert witness. Each additional one named is a bonus of 100 points.

(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue;
(b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data;
(c) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and
(d) the expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.

500

803(2): Excited Utterance 

Give a definition for all of the above rules. 

2) A statement made about a surprising event, where the declarant makes the statement because they are startled by the event in question.

500

Give an example of entering a piece of evidence.

1) identify

2) hand to witness

3) Authenticate

4) Enter