Definitions
States
Foreign Policy
'Isms
War
100

ideology holding that the political and the national unit should be congruent

Nationalism

100

Coercive control of the population, Territorial sovereignty, Functional specialization, Hierarchy and International recognition are characteristics of this entity

The Modern State

100

The explanation that policy choice is influenced by the conflict between domestic and international policy. Ex. Guns versus Butter

Domestic Politics

100

This body of political thought stresses the importance of logic and the pursuit of power by states in the international anarchic system

Realism

100

The lack of a common power capable of resolving disputes

Anarchy

200

Grievances of population and ease of resistance to the state are two possible causes for states to not be able to exert effective control over its territory and population

State Failure

200

A political system in which candidates compete for political office through frequent, fair elections in which a sizeable portion of the adult population can vote

Democracy

200

The explanation that policy choice is influenced by the nature of governments being large organizations with their own interests and coordination issues.

Bureaucratic Politics

200

This body of political thought is based on the critique of another body of thought that became popular in the 20th century to explain World War I.

Liberalism

200

The framework of analysis that explains war as being caused by bad individuals and the inherent evil of human nature.

Individual Level of Analysis

300

the treatment of states as coherent actors with a set of interests that belong to the state

Unitary State Assumption

300

A political system in which an individual or small group exercises power with few constraints and no meaningful competition or participation by the general public

Autocracy

300

The explanation that policy choice is influenced by the desires and fears of leaders and the overestimation of the importance of historical events, opponents or ones own government

Perception and misperception

300

This theory traces its originals back to historical thinkers Thucydides, Niccolo Machiavelli, and Thomas Hobbes.

Development of Realist Tradition

300

The framework of analysis for war that focuses on states and argues that democracies and more economically developed countries are less warlike

State Level of Analysis

400

wars are that fought to prevent an adversary from becoming more powerful in the future

Preventive War

400

Faster economic growth, Extraction of revenue, and Superior decision-making institutions are advantages of this government system

Democracy 

400

States force concessions by threatening to use force if no agreement is reached to achieve this

Coercive Diplomacy

400

This theory developed in critique and response to some political scientists analyzing World War I and the international system

Liberalism Development

400

The framework for analysis of war that stresses that war is caused by the changes in the balance of power between states

System-level explanation for war

500

Wars are fought because at least one state thinks war is imminent and wants a first, strive advantage

Preemptive War

500

Countries with democratic governments are less likely to go to war with other democracies.

Democratic Peace

500

a condition in which each actor’s plan is contingent upon its estimate of what the other actor is expected to do

Strategic Interaction

500

Incomplete information, commitment problems, and issue indivisibility are three factors that can cause this process to fail.

Bargaining Model of War