Miranda v. Arizona Facts
Supreme Court Opinion
The Fifth Amendment
Miranda Warnings
Interrogation Techniques
100

The year the Miranda v. Arizona was decided.

1966

100

The Justice who wrote the majority opinion.

Chief Justice Warren
100

Who the Fifth Amendment protect people from?

The government

100

The first Miranda Warning.

You have the right to remain silent.

100

The Civil Rights Commission found that in the 1960s police were still using this type of tactic to obtain confessions.

Physical Coercion /physical force /physical violence

200

Mr. Miranda's first name.

Ernesto

200

The vote in the case.

5 to 4

200

The principle that you can not be tried twice for the same crime.

Double Jeopardy

200

The second Miranda Warning

Anything you say will be used in the court of law.

200

Am I required to answer questions about my citizenship?

No, one does not have to answer the questions about their citizenship, where were they born, whether one is a US citizen, or how they enter the country

300

The two charges that Miranda was arrested for.

Rape and kidnapping

300

Miranda v. Arizona is considered the most famous case on this topic ever.

Confession (police interrogation for confession)

300

The principle that a government must provide all procedural rights that are owed to a person.

Due Process

300

The third Miranda Warning

You have the right to an attorney.

300

Does the violation of Miranda warnings automatically dismiss a case? How so?

No! The violation of Miranda warnings only suppress the statements (confession) from that specific interrogation. The case with other evidence can continue to proceed.

400

Miranda's sentence.

20-30 years

400

The practice of interrogating suspects without informing them of their rights violates this Amendment.

The Fifth Amendment

400

The principle that you do not have to be the witness against yourself.

Self-incrimination

400

The fourth Miranda Warning.

If you do not have an attorney, one will be provided to you.

400

Are statement made by the suspect without police questioning admissible to the court?

Yes, spontaneous statements are still admissible to the court without interrogation or Miranda warnings being read.

500

The other three defendants from Miranda's case.

Michael Vignara, Carl Westover, and Roy Stewart.

500

The two conditions that must be met in order for Miranda warnings to be required.

1) In custody, and 

2) Being interrogated

500

The five rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.

1) Grand jury,

2) against double jeopardy,

3) against self-incrimination,

4) due process (right to legal representation/lawyer being interrogated),

5) against unlawful taking.

500

This happens if a suspect makes a confession without being given Miranda warnings.

The confession will be suppressed

500

The longer the interrogation lasts, the more likely it is to produce this type of confession.

False confession