CC, CI, p-values
PICO & Variables
Study Designs
Ethics and Validity
Stats and Data
100

A correlation coefficient of r = 0.85 indicates this type of relationship

A strong, positive relationship 

(example of strong negative relationship = -0.85)

100

What is the intervention and what is the outcome in the following question: 

In first-time postpartum mothers, does peer support increase breastfeeding duration at 3 months compared to standard postpartum care?

I - peer support

O - breastfeeding duration

100
If a researcher starts with the dependent variable (or outcome) and looks back to see the cause, this design is referred to as: 

Retrospective

100

If identities are not collected at all, this is maintained

Anonymity (vs. confidentiality, where identifying information is collected but not shared)

100

This number tells you how likely your result is due to chance.

P-value

200

A relative risk of 2.0 between the intervention and control group means:  


The exposed/intervention group is twice as likely to experience the outcome

200

Weight in kilograms is this type of variable

Ratio

(Ranks attributes but equal distance between values with absolute zero point)

200

This type of research tests cause-and-effect or seeks to establish causal relationships (one variable directly causes another) 

Experimental

200

This framework of principles was developed to address ethical concerns in Indigenous research and recognize community rights in research. 

OCAP (ownership, control, access and possession)

200

This type of error occurs when the researchers reject a true null hypothesis.

Type I error

300

A study found the mean BP difference was 8 mmHg with a 95% CI of 1 to 15. How should this be interpreted

The researchers are 95% confident the true difference is between 1 and 15 mmHg

300

This type of variable is manipulated by the researcher in an experiment.

Independent 


300

A design comparing outcomes before and after an intervention in one group

Single-arm pre-post study (quasi-experimental)

Also can be called interrupted time series design

300

This type of validity examines the extent to which scores on a measure compare to the gold-standard 

Criterion validity

300

The range in which we expect the true value to lie, with a certain level of confidence.

Confidence Interval

Confidence intervals provide information about statistical significance and precision of the estimate

400

If the p-value is 0.02 and α = 0.05, the result is considered:

Statistically significant (p<alpha)

400

True or false: Defining anxiety as a "score on the GAD-7 scale" is an example of an operational definition.

True

400

True or false: In observational research, data is collected by observing without intervening

Bonus: what are some examples of observational study designs?

True

Cohort study, case-control study, cross-sectional survey

400

The degree to which the effects detected in the study are a true reflection of reality rather than a result of extraneous variables

Internal validity

400

This type of error occurs when the researchers incorrectly accept the null hypothesis (that there is no difference between groups when in reality there is) 

Type 2 error

500

If the 95% confidence interval for a relative risk is 0.7–1.2 for a measure of dichotomous data, what does that mean

The result is not statistically significant because it includes 1 (dichotomous data - 1.0 is point of no difference between groups)

(When measuring continuous data, if CI contains 0 then the result is not significant) 

500

Patient satisfaction rated as “very dissatisfied” to “very satisfied” is an example of this level of measurement

Ordinal (ordered or ranked categories but distance between categories is not necessarily equal)

500

What is the key element of an RCT that makes it the "gold standard" for clinical research?

Participants are randomized to intervention or control group (accounts for variation in sample)

500

If the sample of a quantitative study is not representative of the population, this is a threat to: 

Bonus: what can the researchers do to mitigate this?

External validity (generalizability to wider population)

Use of random (probability) sampling; multi-site study; larger sample size 

500

This measure tells us the direction and strength of a relationship between two variables.


Correlation coefficient