Strategic Terrorism
Suicide Terrorism
Radicalization
Public Opinion and Emotion
Public Opinion and Outgroup Attitudes
100

From a rationalist perspective, why is terrorism puzzling?

Terrorism is costly and risky, actors have incentives to locate mutually preferred negotiated solutions

100

What are some reasons that terrorists use suicide terrorism as a tactic?

Simple, low-cost, guarantees mass casualties, no fear of detention, immense impact on public and media

100

Describe the collective action problem of perpetrating terrorism.

Terrorism is individually costly (e.g. you could die), but successful terrorism benefits everyone (e.g. your whole ethnic group gets a new state)

100

What potential effect does availability bias have on public fear in the context of terrorism?

Can lead to overestimation of risk

100

How does the availability bias affect public perceptions of terrorism?

Individuals may think of more examples of Muslim terrorists

200

What can we learn about terrorism from the Prisoner’s Dilemma?

Talk is cheap!

200

What considerations does a state face when dealing with suicide terrorism?

Sensitive to citizen casualties, constrained ability to retaliate, face reality of consequential, if weak otherwise, violent group

200

How do terrorist groups solve the collective action problem?

Coercion: developing group norms and new moral framework

200

Describe the effect of anger as a moral emotion.

Willing to risk backlash to satisfy punitive preferences

200

What is the tradeoff between civil liberties and counterterrorism?

Policies that may be deemed useful to counterterrorism (racial profiling) have value tradeoffs (immoral and effective).

300

Because it is hard for weak actors to make credible threats, they are forced to display publicly just how far they are willing to go to obtain their desired results. What is this a form of?

Costly signaling

300

What are the downsides to using suicide terrorism as a tactic?

Legitimacy costs, can be disrupted
300

Name three pathways to radicalization.

Personal victimization, political grievance, slippery slope, power of love, extremity shift in like-minded groups, extreme cohesion under isolation/threat, competition for same base of support, competition with state power, within group competition, jujitsu politics, hate, martyrdom

300

What is the relationship between fear and the attrition logic of terrorism?

Publics in fear want to prevent/avoid terrorism and thus may prefer to cede policy goals to prevent future terrorism

300

What types of terrorist attacks receive more media attention than others?

Perpetrator Muslim, attack on a government target, perpetrator arrests, more lethal

400

Describe terrorism as a tool.

Terrorism represents a strategic instrument that any party in a conflict with another may use

400

What is a potential way to reduce suicide bombing? 

It is difficult to do, but target the broader organization

400

What attribute do most paths to radicalization share?

10 out of 12 of the paths are reactive. They perceive their motives to be reactions to an action by an adversary

400

What is the relationship between anger and the provocation logic of terrorism?

Angry publics will have moral outrage and push for vengeance, encourage leaders to retaliate

400

What are some potential reasons that Muslim terrorist receive more media attention?

Their connection with a larger group, experts questioning whether other attacks count as terrorism, whether the attack is claimed

500

If we consider terrorism to be a tool, what might a potential solution be?

Focusing on broader strategic incentives (defending civilian sites, creating norms to punish terrorists)

500

What is one potential consequence of targeting an organization to reduce suicide terrorism?

Provocation. Could lead to more terrorism/

500

What is the pyramid model of radicalization?

Base of pyramid is supporters, followed by supporters, with terrorists at the apex. (McCauley)

500

What dilemma might political leaders face when the public is angry?

While terrorism could be evidence of militant weakness for politicians, voters are outraged and demand retribution

500

What is the difference between statistical and taste-based discrimination?

Statistical: individuals’ tendencies to stereotype based on differential base likelihoods of groups engaging in a given activity.

Taste-based: individuals have an intrinsic animus against individuals of other racial backgrounds that structures their behavior towards these groups, regardless of the base likelihood the outgroup member is a threat.