Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Chapter 10
100

What's random assignment and why does it matter?

Definition: Assigning participants with no systematic bias in how the subjects are assigned to groups

Why do we care: Increases generalizability, decreases accusations of bias, etc

100

What's random assignment and random sampling?

Random assignment- All participants are just as likely to be assigned to the control group as to the experimental group 

Random sampling- The randomization in selecting participants to be a part of study 

100

Why does "Einstein syndrome" need to be kept in check? 

It can promote the spread of pseudo science, incorrect scientific claims, and decreases misinformation spread via exaggeration

100

True or false: Any amount of emotional influence in the creation of the study invalidates it

False- Researchers just need to have their work checked to minimize its impact

100

What are common examples of "person who" statistics?

People who smoke, use substances, the vaccines and autism crowd, even flat earthers or claims of aliens can be "people who" bucked the trend

200

What's a control group and why do they experience what they do? 

Definition: The participant group who gets doodley squat (no intervention)

Why: To increase proof of effectiveness from the experimental group

200

How is basic and applied research different?  

Basic- Focuses on hypothesis and theory testing

Applied- Applying hypothesis and theory in the real world

200

What's the principle of connectivity?

A scientific theory or hypothesis must connect with previously established empirical facts, not only explaining new facts but also accounting for old ones.

200

True or false: Emotional influence is only a factor to measure in researchers 

False- Researching emotionally charged topics such as politics, animal rights, or cultural phenomena can be difficult to control for in participants as well (remember my tangent on incels)

200

What's a cognitive illusion? 

Even when people know the correct answer, they may be drawn to an incorrect conclusion by the structure of the problem (aka how the question is worded or phrase)

300

True or false: Clever Hans was a horse that could count

False- The horse was indeed clever, yet it was proven he could not count. He relied on other tools and sensory input to "count" correctly

300

True or false: Research conducted on animals is viewed as "less than" by the scientific community 

False: Animal research, particularly in mice and monkeys, is seen as almost preferable to human studies for formulating theories/hypotheses. 

- You get brownie points thinking of reasons why this is

300

What are the 2 principles of converging evidence?

  1. Experiments with limitations- Experiments can go wrong but researchers examine possible flaws in research literature

  2. Theory testing- When research is highly convergent after a series of experiments that consistently support a given theory while possibly eliminating a competing theory

300

What does "magnitude" mean in a research context? 

The possible influence of a variable that may depend on the influence of another variable 

300

True or false: Many common folk psychology sayings are supported using statistical reasoning

lol nope- the opposite is true. Remember that video from class; our brains detect patterns, but we need science to validate them. 
400

How do we combat control group "inequality"? 

Remember in lecture I shared the meme with Dave Chappelle saying "Why? Cause f*ck em, that's why!". If you're lucky enough to be sorted in the experimental group, awesome. If not, too bad so sad.

400

True or false: The "college sophomore" problem completely discredits most research from American Universities 

False: Although seen as not ideal, it gives a decent "launching point" for other researchers to confirm the findings 

400

After numerous class tangents, why am I (and full time researchers) opposed to statements like "This experiment/procedure proves XYZ"?

- No single study proves everything
- Phrasing is important "provides evidence for" instead of "completely removes"

400

True or false: We can derive information from studies with the best implementation yet they don't provide significant or applicable results

Absolutely true- Just because we didn't get the results we wanted, we're still providing to the literature if and only if we use correct research methods

400

How is failure to use sample size information dangerous? 

- Higher chance of sampling error
500

In my lecture example of the hand sanitizer situation, what was the independent and dependent variables?

Independent: Introduction of the hand sanitizer/cleaning solution

Dependent: Medical outcomes of the clinic patients

500

Were the findings of the infamous "Marshmallow study" supported after replications? 

Yes and no- It supported ideas behind emotional regulation and delay of gratification, but it doesn't doom kids to a poor future if they eat the marshmallow early

500

What's a meta analysis and why are they important? 

Using statistics to combine results from dozens or sometimes hundreds of studies to form a conclusion 

- Remember my tangent on Carl Rogers, the big name therapist. He used one to prove therapy works!

500

What's a zero sum attitude and why do we care?

Definition- All causes of a phenomena compete with one another, and by emphasizing one it reduces the emphasis on the others

Why we care- Think about how/why we can't account for all variables at once. Sometimes research follows the same tendency and can't make every theory a priority

500

What was the example I gave in class about how "modern" or "millennial" gambling can still be impacted by gamblers fallacy?

Lootbox/microtransaction mechanics. 

Someone could pay X amount of money, the receive something good. The gamblers fallacy happens when they may assume they'll get something similar or better in the future drawing information from their past experience.