HARHAR
XOXOXO
KINEMPER
KINESO
100
Is this enforceable for Privacy Policy?
Yes, this is enforceable because there is no one liner about data collection.
100
True or False. Image is NOT in violation for Prohibited Ad Content.
False. Ayurveda is a treatment starts with an internal purification process, followed by a special diet, herbal remedies, massage therapy, yoga, and meditation.
100
Image is Beer Mug but not labeled, can we consider this image a violation if we encounter it in app experience?
Pass. This would not be an enforcement, since there is no label. It needs to be a textual call out for it to be considered a violation.
100
Is this enforceable for Ad Formats > Disguised Ad?
We consider this as a pass since “more” is talking about functionality and it describes something in the label.
200
Would you enforce this for Weblinks in Metadata?
Pass. Link from the description leads to a page where the image of a woman wearing a bikini is not sexually suggestive.
200
What would be the correct decision?
We can fail the app for gambling (simulated gambling) because of the betting functionality presented in the metadata. Metadata is highly marketed as a betting game and the in-app provides betting for toys with the corresponding value.
200
Identify which is compliant.
200
Valid or Invalid?
Invalid. App's affiliation can only be found under contact or in email format.
300
What's your take? The app is opted in and an educational app that has topics like areas of body, love, sexuality and identity and even have sexual education. Upon checking the in app there are detailed genitals and sexual acts.
Pass for SC since the app is an educational app.
300
If you have an app that is rated < 13 only and upon checking in app you’ll see login wall, facebook sign in, and google sign in and you can able to bypass the wall using TC provided what will be your decision and #?
#usercred #oauthpause
300
App is opted out. This fails for Age Screen since there is a statement restricting DOB to only >13 even if it does not automatically pops up upon opening the app. True or False.
TRUE
300
What's your take?
Fail for Violence. The description clearly contains an unexpected theme which is to smash the face of enemies, it’s shocking and disturbing content. However, based on in-app experience, like the previous scenario, it is acceptable for everyone rating because it’s unrealistic violence with no blood or gore.
400
Give atleast five (5) policies that needs to have a polaroid attached when enforcing.
ATD
Gambling
SC
Violence
IARC
PP
All ADS with camera icon
400
Can we still HIT this for Content Requirements Webview if the In-app content is blank page as well as the Victim site is blank page.
Pass. This would be a pass for content requirements as the in app only shows a blank page, therefore we cannot verify if there’s any additional functionalities in the app.
400
What action are you going to make if you found a violation with P0/P1 apps in ATC_DSOK?
Send Warning
400
Give two (2) allowed exceptions of DFF Eligibility.
An app is DFF Eligible if the app description has any of the following:
The description says it is for children, kids, and/or users under 13 (for kids)
The description says it is for all ages, parents & kids, teachers & students (mixed audience)
The description is user-agnostic (i.e. students, learners, or people) [does not make mention of what age the intended user is]
500
Give the four (4) scenarios occur after inputting credentials.
- App freezes, crashes, or does not load.
- App surfaces connection error messages (e.g., server connection, network error, no network access permission).
- App is unable to operate using VPN.
- App redirects to Google Play store to update version.
500
Based on the ss in-app, this wall requires us to input our name for registration and the developer does not provide a name in the CI. And based on the generic PII, we should only input generic PII for signing in, and not for registration for signing up. Can we enforce this for Login Credentials?
For this example, I would pass and only consider it as a sign-in if it’s using it as a username since the generic PI does work.
500
App is Opted-In, is this enforceable under DFF Eligibility?
Pass. Student section is included, though it is somehow marketed as a school management app.
500
An app has a login wall and the developer did not provide testing credentials and it also has a LC warning and the app is NOT a first publish app. What would be the proper action and hashtags?
Pass. #NoTC and #Wall