Rawlsian Concepts
The Veil of Ignorance
Justice as Fairness
Rawls in the Real World
Rawls vs. His Critics
200

This imaginative device asks you to design a society without knowing your future position within it.

The Veil of Ignorance
200

Behind the veil, you lack knowledge of your race, class, gender, or talents — collectively known as these.

Contingent Attributes

200

This is Rawls’s name for his overall theory of justice.

Justice as Fairness

200

Rawls’s framework is often applied to this public service sector to argue for equal access regardless of income.

Healthcare

200

This philosopher argued that Rawls’s theory relies too heavily on abstract individualism and ignores community values.

Michael Sandel

400

Rawls argues that these must be equal for all citizens — including freedom of speech, conscience, and political participation.

Basic Liberties

400

Rawls uses the veil to argue that rational people would choose principles that protect this group in society.

The Least Advantaged

400

Rawls says society should be viewed as a type of cooperative venture for mutual advantage.

A Fair System of Social Cooperation

400

The difference principle supports progressive versions of this government policy tool

Taxation

400

Libertarians argue that Rawls’s difference principle violates this fundamental right to one’s own labor and property.

Self-Ownership

600

This principle states that social and economic inequalities are only justified if they benefit the least advantaged.

The Difference Principle

600

The veil of ignorance is part of this larger hypothetical decision-making scenario Rawls uses to justify his principles.

The Original Position

600

Rawls’s first principle takes priority over the second, a relationship he calls this.

Lexical Priority

600

Rawlsian analysis of climate change emphasizes protecting these communities, which face the greatest environmental risks

Vulnerable or Marginalized Communities

600

Some critics say Rawls’s veil of ignorance assumes people are too risk‑averse, a critique often associated with this field of economics.

Behavioral Economics

800

Rawls contrasts his theory with that of the utilitarian philosopher, who believed maximizing total happiness was the goal of justice.

John Stuart Mill/ Utilitarianism

800

Rawls believes that people behind the veil would reject this economic system if it allowed extreme inequality without compensating the worst-off.

Unregulated Capitalism

800

Rawls argues that positions of power and privilege must be open to all under conditions of this.

Fair Equality of Opportunity

800

Rawls’s ideas are used to critique this practice in voting districts, which undermines equal political participation.

Gerrymandering

800

Communitarians argue that Rawls underestimates the moral importance of these shared cultural structures.

Social Traditions or Communal Values

1000

Rawls claims that a just society must be structured around these two key principles, chosen under fair conditions of equality

The Two Principles of Justice

1000

Critics argue that the veil assumes individuals are motivated by this type of risk-averse reasoning.

Maximin Reasoning

1000

Rawls’s theory is often contrasted with that of this libertarian thinker, who argued that redistributive taxation violates individual rights

Robert Nozick

1000

Rawls’s framework is frequently invoked in debates about this 2005 disaster, highlighting how the least advantaged were disproportionately harmed.

Hurricane Katrina

1000

This philosopher claimed that Rawls’s principles are too idealized and fail to address real-world power imbalances

Charles Mills