Research Methods
Experimental Design
he definition, manipulation, measurement and control of variables
100

Two types of Self- Reports

Questionnaire

Interviews

100

This Experimental Design has less Demand Characteristics & no Order Effects

Independent Measures Design

100

Difference between Aim and Hypotheses

The aim tells you the purpose of the

investigation

A testable statement

A hypothesis should also be falsifiable

200

The purpose of Filler Questions- with examples

Filler questions: items put into a questionnaire, interview or test to disguise the aim of the study by hiding the important questions among irrelevant ones so that participants are less likely to alter their behaviour by working out the aims

200

What is meant by Experimental Design? 

The way that participants are used in different levels of the IV is called the experimental design. They may be allocated to all, or only one, of the levels of the IV.

200

Operationalize Social Anxiety

  • self-rating scores on a social anxiety scale
  • number of recent behavioral incidents of avoidance of crowded places
  • intensity of physical anxiety symptoms in social situations
300

Positive & Negative Correlation- with examples

In a positive correlation, the two variables increase together

In a negative correlation, higher scores on one variable correspond with low scores on the other  

300

Give an example scenario of a Matched Pairs Design

Any example

300

Operationalize Customer Loyalty

  • Customer ratings on a questionnaire assessing satisfaction and intention to purchase again.
  • Records of products purchased by repeat customers in a three-month period.

 

400

2 differences between a field experiment and a natural experiment

a field experiment has a manipulated IV and a measured DV and happens in the normal environment for the activity being investigated. 

In field experiments the experimenter deliberately alters the DV

natural experiments might be more ethical because there is no deliberate interference with the participants’ existence

400

2 ways to overcome Order Effect

  1. random allocation

  2. .counterbalancing

400

Operationalize 

  • Sleep
  • Social media behavior

Sleep  

Amount of sleep  / Quality of sleep/ Average number of hours of sleep per night 

Social media Behavior

Frequency of social media use[ Number of logins during the day ] / Social media platform preferences [Most frequently used social media platform ] / Night-time social media use [Amount of time spent using social media before sleep ]

500

2 Strengths and 2 Limitations of Case study

Strengths

  • Provides detailed (rich qualitative) information.

  • Provides insight for further research.

  • Permitting investigation of otherwise impractical (or unethical) situations


  • Limitations

    • Lacking scientific rigour and providing little basis for generalization of results to the wider population.

    • Researchers' own subjective feeling may influence the case study (researcher bias).

    • Difficult to replicate.

    • Time-consuming and expensive.

    • The volume of data, together with the time restrictions in place, impacted on the depth of analysis that was possible within the available resources.

500

2 Strengths and 2 Limitations of Repeated Measures Design

S

  • Participant variables are unlikely to distort the effect of the IV, as each participant does all levels

  • Counterbalancing reduces order effects

  • Uses fewer participants than repeated measures so is good when participants are hard to find or if participants are at risk

W

  • Order effect could distort the results

  • As participants see the experimental task more than once, they have greater exposure to demand characteristics

500

What are "Controls" in Research?

Controls make sure that the levels of the IV represent what they are supposed to, i.e. that the differences between them are going to create the intended situations to test the hypothesis.

  • every participant is treated in the same way

  • use standardised instructions for all participants

  • having equipment or tests that are consistent, i.e. that measure the same variable every time and always do so in the same way

  • In laboratory experiments, standardisation is easier than in other studies, as equipment is likely to be consistent, for example stopwatches or brain scans