CRIME AND PUNISHMENT
THE FOURTH AMENDMENT PROTECTS CITIZENS FROM THIS
UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND SEIZURES
MGL CH90 S9D WINDOW TINT CARRIES THIS PENALTY
MONETARY FINE $255
THIS MUNICIPALITY HAS THE COURT CODE OF 01
BOSTON MUNICIPAL.
THIS CLEAR CODE MEANS CITATION ARREST AND MUST BE PAIRED WITH THIS ADDITIONAL REQUEST.
AC-70, ARREST REPORT.
THIS 1989 CASE ESTABLISHED THIS STANDARD FOR EVALUATING USE OF FORCE INCIDENTS.
GRAHAM V CONOR, OBJECTIVE REASONABLENESS
THE MGL WITH INTENTIONS OF MAIMING OR DISFIGUREMENT GOES BY THIS TITLE
MAYHEM
THIS CHAPTER AND SECTION COVER SPINNING OR SCREECHING TIRES
KQ REFERS TO THIS
DRIVER HISTORY
THIS 1985 CASE RULED THAT DEADLY FORCE IS JUSTIFIED ONLY WHEN THE SUSPECT POSES A SIGNIFICANT THREAT.
TENNESSEE V GARNER
THIS IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR MGL CH265 SEC 22 RAPE
15 YEARS
THIS IS THE RIGHT OF ARREST FOR MGL CH90 SEC24(2) OTE
WARRANTLESS ARREST IN PRESENCE FOR BREACH OF THE PEACE.
THIS 10 CODE MEANS "TAKING A BREAK"
10-120
THIS 1968 CASE ESTABLISHED THAT OFFICERS MAY STOP AND FRISK AN INDIVIDUAL BASED ON REASONABLE SUSPICION THAT A PERSON IS ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
TERRY V OHIO
JOHN SOFIS SCHEFT REFERS TO THESE 6 ARRESTABLE MOTOR-VEHICLE OFFENSES AS ULIARS.
OUI 90/24, UNLICENSED90/10, LEAVING THE SCENE OF INJURY90/24L/G/, USE WITHOUT AUTHORITY90/24/2, REFUSE TO STOP 90/25, SUSPENDED LICENSE 90/23.
THIS MGL REQUIRES MOTORCYCLE OPERATORS WEAR A HELMET
MGL CH90 SEC7E MOTORCYCLE EQUIPMENT VIOLATION.
THIS 1961 CASE APPLIED THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE "FRUITS OF THE POINSONOUS TREE"
MAPP V OHIO
TO CHARGE UNDER MGL CH269 SEC10(2) CARRYING A NON PER SE DANGEROUS WEAPON THE SUSPECT MUST BE ARRESTED FOR ONE OF THESE TWO REASONS.
WARRANT, BREACH OF THE PEACE.
UNDER MGL CH90 SEC10 A JOL IS NOT ALLOWED TO OPERATE A MOTOR VEHICLE BETWEEN THESE HOURS AS A PRIMARY VIOLATION.
100AM - 400AM PRIMARY VIOLATION, 1230AM-500AM AS SECONDARY VIOLATIONS
THIS 1993 CASE VALIDATED THE "PLAIN FEEL" DOCTRINE.