What was the original goal of the home economics movement?
To improve family life, health, and education through scientific knowledge
Who primarily led and benefited from the home economics movement?
Women, especially middle-class women seeking education and influence.
True or False: Home economics was only about cooking and sewing?
False
Name one modern subject influenced by home economics
Nutrition, child development, family studies, or consumer science
Why is the name "Home economics" misleading?
Because the field extended far beyond the home into policy, science, and education.
How did home economics connect science to everyday life?
by applying chemistry, biology, and economics to home and family decisions
Home economics gave women access to what they were often denied?
Higher education and professional careers
How did home economics influence public policy?
By shaping nutrition guidelines, sanitation, and family welfare programs
What current college major evolved from home economics?
Human development and Family sciences
why was home economics sometimes undervalued?
Because it was associated with womens work
why was home economics considered a reform movement?
it aimed to improve public health and social conditions.
how did the movement challenge gender roles?
by allowing women to become professionals and educators
What tension existed between feminism and home economics?
Some saw it as empowering, others as reinforcing traditional roles.
Why is the field still relevant today?
It addresses real-life issues like family well-being and equity.
What is one misconception the author challenges in the ending?
That home economics lacked intellectual or political significance.
How did home economics redefine “the home”?
As a site of scientific and economic importance.
What long-term opportunity did home economics create for women?
Leadership in education, research, and policy.
Why did male-dominated fields often dismiss home economics?
Because it threatened traditional power structures.
How does home economics connect to social justice today?
Through advocacy for families, children, and marginalized groups.
What lesson does the ending suggest about undervalued fields?
They can still create meaningful change.
How did home economics blur the line between private and public life?
By turning household issues into public concerns.
What does the ending suggest about women’s influence through the field?
Women shaped society through education and reform.
Why was home economics considered “quietly radical”?
It changed systems without direct political confrontation.
What does the author argue should happen to the field moving forward?
It should be revalued and recognized.
Why is understanding the history of home economics important today?
It shows how everyday life is connected to power and policy.