CREAC
Hierarchy of Authority
Rule Extraction
Writing
Reasoning
100

A description of a case that helps prove or clarify a rule and helps preview the framework for the application.

Case illustration. ALW p. 114.

100

Commentary about the law that is not binding.

Secondary authority. ALW p. 16.

100

A legal principle that appears in the text of a primary source.

An explicit rule. ALW p. 103.

100

When writing a rule, you use this tense.

Present tense. Class 5, Slide 17.

100

This kind of authority controls the outcome of a legal issue in a jurisdiction.

Binding or mandatory authority. ALW p. 23.

200

This states the legal principle the case illustration will clarify and/or prove to be true.

A hook. ALW p. 116.

200

When courts are bound by decisions of courts above them in their court system hierarchy.

Vertical Precedent. Class 2, Slide 13.

200

A legal principle that is supported by but absent from the text of a primary source.

An implicit rule. ALW p. 104.

200

When writing the trigger facts, you use this tense.

Past tense. Class 5, Slide 18.

200

This kind of authority does not control the outcome of a legal issue in a jurisdiction.

Persuasive authority. ALW p. 24.

300

An acronym for the components of a legal argument.

CREAC. ALW pp. 93-94.

300

When courts may be bound by decisions of courts at the same level in their court system hierarchy.

Horizontal Precedent. Class 2, Slide 15.

300

A combination of legal principles from more than one authority.

A synthesized rule. ALW p. 63.

300

The technique of beginning the second sentence with an idea from the prior sentence.

A bridge. ALW p. 110.

300

Reasoning that applies the key language from the rule directly to a client’s facts.

Rule-based reasoning. ALW p. 143.

400

This tells the reader the point that the following analogy will prove. 


A point sentence. ALW p. 149.

400

Court-created law in the absence of state or federal legislation.

Common law. ALW p. 21.

400

This sets the standard in your client’s case; controls the answer to your client’s question; and creates a structure around which your argument should be organized.

The governing rule. ALW p. 61.

400

The name for a verb that has been turned into a noun.

Nominalization, zombie noun, derivative noun, or hidden verb. PEL pp. 22-23.

Instead of writing: "The doctor performed an examination of the patient."

Write: "The doctor examined the patient."

400

Reasoning that applies the law to the client’s facts through an analogy.

Analogical reasoning. ALW p. 147.

500

Name the sections of an objective legal memo.

Heading, [Question Presented, Brief Answer,] Statement of Facts, Discussion, Conclusion. Class 5, Slides 9-14.

500

Name the hierarchy of primary authorities.

Constitution, statues, regulations, and judicial opinions. Class 2, Slide 4.

500

Give an example of a word or a phrase in a statute that tells you the statute's list is illustrative, not exhaustive.

"or" or "Without limiting"

Class 1, Slide 29

500

Name the four things you consider before you begin writing a new genre of writing.

Audience, purpose, structure, and persona. Class 1, Slide 11.

500

Name the components of an analogical application.

Point sentence, fact-to-fact comparison, and legal consequence. ALW p. 148.