500
How, if at all, should the direct or re-direct of Bailey Bell-Leon be altered if the defense is pursuing an alternate perpetrator theory, but does not make clear who they believe is the alternate perpetrator at this point in the trial?
What, if anything, on defense's cross of bailey would make it clear who the defense claims the alt perp is?
On direct, talk about door swinging shut automatically--this gets rid of idea that someone could just walk in, has to have a key.
If, on Cx, defense talks about the messages to other people, then we know they are likely blaming another lover or one of them. In that case, re-dx on timeline.
If, on Cx, defense talks about Kerry's sadness about Carmen leaving but does not talk about other messages, they are likely blaming a drug dealer or customer. No need to re-dx on bailey but be ready on other witnesses.