Atkinson & Shiffrin
Bartlett
Yuille & Cutshall
Englich & Mussweiler
100

What is the name of the model they made?

Multi-Store Model

100
What year was the study conducted?

1932

100

Which other study had the same aim but different findings?

Loftus & Palmer

100

What was the main topic of the study?

Anchoring bias

200

What year was the model made?

1968

200

What was the aim of the study?

To investigate how the memory of a story is affected by previous knowledge (cultural schemas).

200

What group of participants were included? (# of participants and type)

13 eyewitnesses

200
How did they control the level of courtroom experience?

They used trial judges who all had around the same amount of experience.

300

Name 2 limitations to the model.

- Describes but does not explain how/why it works

- States that memory formation processes are grouped 

- Memories are more complex than the model implies

- Rehearsal alone is too simple to explain why information is transferred from STS to LTS

- The model does not account for the process of forgetting

- The model does not account for the type of information taken into memory

300

What is the keyword of the study's findings?

Distortion

300

What was the picture in the document and how does it relate to the study?

A picture of a thief. 

The study was based on a crime scene including a robber.

300

What was the aim of the study?

To determine the effect of a prosecutor’s suggestion for sentencing, on the decision-making of a judge.

(Leading question)

400

What were the findings?

That STS and LTS are two different cognitive processes.

400

What were the 3 patterns of distortion? Explain 

- Assimilations --> details were changed due to different cultural backgrounds.

- Leveling --> the story became shorter because each participant left out information that was unimportant to their cultural values.

- Sharpening --> they changed the order of the story to make sense of it in terms of familiarity in their own culture. They added details and/or emotions

400

What is the main limitation of the study?

It is not replicable.

400

What were the participants asked in the questionnaire? (4 questions)

- Do you think that the sentence was too low, adequate or too high?

- What sentence would you recommend?

- How certain are you about your sentencing decision? (a scale of 1 – 9)

- How realistic do you think this case is? (a scale of 1 – 9)

500

Name the 5 different sensory registers. (Scientific names)

Echoic, iconic, haptic, gustatory and olfactory

500

Describe the method.

Repeated reproduction

- The story was read out loud for the participants

- They were asked to reproduce the story several times

- Intervals - days, weeks, months or years

Serial reproduction

- They were asked to recall the study and repeat it to another person

500

Why could this be considered unethical?

Because they're asked to recall a traumatic experience that can affect their mental health in negative ways.

500

What were the findings of the study?

When the participants were given a low anchor (12 months)

- Average sentence was 18.78 months

When the participant was given a high anchor (34 months)

- Average sentence was 28.70 months