1
The word sympathy contains the Greek root-path-. Which idea from the article best illustrates sympathy?
Text Evidence: The article encourages readers to understand veterans who are “struggling with other emotions.”
Answer: Readers are encouraged to feel concern and understanding for returning veterans.
Explanation: The root-path- means feeling, and sympathy means sharing or understanding another person's feelings.
How does understanding the root-path- help readers determine the meaning of the word empathy as it relates to the article?
Text Evidence: The article explores the emotional burden of survivor guilt experienced by soldiers.
Answer: Empathy means understanding and sharing another person's feelings.
Explanation: Readers who know-path- means feeling can infer that empathy involves connecting with another person's emotions.
The word pathos refers to an appeal to emotions. Which passage creates pathos in the article?
Text Evidence: “When he was in trouble, he was alone. When we were in trouble, he was there for us.”
Answer: The quotation from Adrian Bonenberger creates pathos.
Explanation: It evokes sadness and compassion, helping readers emotionally connect with the topic of survivor guilt.
Which statement from the article best demonstrates the concept of empathy?
Text Evidence: “But how unreasonable is that feeling?”
Answer: Sherman asks readers to consider and understand the feelings of survivors.
Explanation: Rather than judging soldiers, she encourages readers to appreciate the emotions behind survivor guilt.
Which of the following words containing the root-path- best describes the response Sherman hopes readers will have toward veterans: empathy, apathy, or antipathy?
Text Evidence: Sherman explains veterans' emotional struggles after war
Answer: Empathy
Explanation: By describing veterans' experiences in detail, Sherman encourages readers to understand and share their feelings rather than ignore or dislike them.
How does Sherman establish ethos in the article?
Text Evidence: Sherman discusses the experiences of Adrian Bonenberger and references philosophical ideas about guilt
Answer: She establishes credibility by using real-life examples and philosophical analysis.
Explanation: By incorporating both lived experiences and scholarly perspectives, Sherman demonstrates expertise and encourages readers to trust her argument.
What example of logos does Sherman use to explain survivor guilt?
Text Evidence: “Subjective guilt is thought to be unreasonable because one feels guilty despite the fact that he knows he has done nothing wrong.”
Answer: Sherman logically distinguishes subjective guilt from objective guilt.
Explanation: Defining and comparing the two types of guilt provides evidence-based reasoning that helps readers understand her claim.
Why does Sherman combine pathos and logos in her discussion of survivor guilt?
Text Evidence: Sherman pairs emotional stories with definitions of guilt and responsibility.
Answer: She wants readers to both feel the emotional impact of survivor guilt and understand its logical complexity.
Explanation: The combination strengthens her argument because readers engage emotionally while also evaluating her reasoning.
How does Bonenberger’s story function as a rhetorical appeal?
Text Evidence: “But I feel responsible.”
Answer: The story primarily serves as an appeal to pathos.
Explanation: His feelings of responsibility create an emotional connection with readers, helping them understand why survivor guilt persists.
How does Sherman use logos to challenge the belief that survivor guilt is irrational?
Text Evidence: “But how unreasonable is that f
Answer: She invites readers to reconsider assumptions through logical questioning.
Explanation: Instead of accepting that survivor guilt is irrational, Sherman presents evidence and reasoning that encourage deeper analysis.
eeling?”
Which rhetorical appeal is most evident when Sherman describes survivors trapped in an “endless loop of ‘what ifs’”?
Text Evidence: “The guilt begins an endless loop of ‘what ifs’ or ‘if onlys.’”
Answer: Pathos.
Explanation: The description helps readers imagine the emotional suffering experienced by survivors, creating empathy and emotional engagement.
How does Sherman use a rhetorical question to advance her purpose?
Text Evidence: “But how unreasonable is that feeling?”
Answer: The question encourages readers to think critically about survivor guilt.
Explanation: Rather than providing a direct answer immediately, Sherman prompts readers to examine their own beliefs, making her argument more persuasive.
What can readers infer about the emotional challenges veterans face after returning home?
Text Evidence: “The emotional reality of the soldier at home is often at odds with that of the people they left behind.”
Answer: Veterans often experience emotional struggles that civilians may not fully understand.
Explanation: The statement suggests a disconnect between soldiers' experiences and the perceptions of those around them, requiring readers to make an inference about veterans' hidden emotional burdens.
What claim does the author make about survivor guilt?
Text Evidence: “You did nothing wrong.”
Answer: Survivor guilt can occur even when a person is not responsible for a tragedy.
Explanation: Sherman supports this claim by explaining that feelings of guilt do not always reflect actual wrongdoing.
How does the author support the idea that survivor guilt is more than a psychological response?
Text Evidence: “We often take responsibility in a way that goes beyond what we can reasonably be held responsible for.”
Answer: Sherman argues that survivor guilt is connected to moral responsibility.
Explanation: The statement shows that feelings of guilt may arise from values and relationships rather than actual blame.
What can readers conclude about the role of chance in war?
Text Evidence: “Standing here rather than there can save your life but cost a buddy his.”
Answer: Chance often determines who survives and who does not.
Explanation: This conclusion helps explain why survivors struggle with feelings of guilt despite having little control over outcomes.
What inference can be made about soldiers' sense of duty toward one another?
Text Evidence: “But I feel responsible.”
Answer: Soldiers often feel responsible for one another even beyond their actual obligations.
Explanation: This inference is supported by Bonenberger's feelings despite knowing he was not directly at fault.
Why does Sherman distinguish between subjective guilt and objective guilt?
Text Evidence: “Objective guilt is the result of real wrongdoing.”
Answer: She wants readers to understand that not all guilt stems from wrongdoing.
Explanation: The distinction supports her central argument about survivor guilt.
What conclusion can readers draw about the author's view of human relationships?
Text Evidence: Survivor guilt stems from feelings of responsibility toward others.
Answer: Sherman believes meaningful relationships create strong moral obligations.
Explanation: The article suggests that guilt can arise because people genuinely care about one another.
What can readers infer about civilians' understanding of veterans?
Text Evidence: Friends and families may feel gratitude while veterans struggle with guilt.
Answer: Civilians may not fully recognize the emotional difficulties veterans experience.
Explanation: The contrast highlights different perspectives on a veteran's return home.
What evidence suggests that survivor guilt involves self-reflection?
Text Evidence: Survivors think in terms of “what ifs” and “if onlys.”
Answer: Survivors often analyze past events and their actions.
Explanation: These repeated thoughts indicate deep personal reflection.
What can readers infer about the lasting effects of combat experiences?
Text Evidence: Survivor guilt “follows soldiers everywhere.”
Answer: The emotional effects of war often continue long after combat ends.
Explanation: The statement suggests that experiences from war remain with veterans for years.
Which detail best supports the claim that survivor guilt is emotionally powerful?
Text Evidence: “High on that list of emotions is guilt.”
Answer: Guilt is identified as one of the strongest emotions veterans experience.
Explanation: This evidence directly supports the claim.
How does Bonenberger's statement support an inference about loyalty?
Text Evidence: “When we were in trouble, he was there for us.”
Answer: It suggests that loyalty is highly valued among soldiers.
Explanation: His continued gratitude and guilt demonstrate strong commitment to fellow soldiers.
What inference can be made about the author's purpose?
Text Evidence: Sherman explores whether survivor guilt is truly unreasonable
Answer: Her purpose is to encourage readers to reconsider their understanding of guilt.
Explanation: The article challenges traditional assumptions and presents a more nuanced perspective.