Intentional Torts
Defenses to Intentional Torts
Negligence
Proving Breach of Duty
Causation
100

Trespass to chattels can occur through _____ or _____

Intermeddling or dispossession
100

Voluntary agreement to a defendant's conduct that negates the wrongfulness of an intentional tort

Consent

100
Define constructive & actual knowledge

Constructive: legally presumed to have knowledge based on circumstances

Actual: knowledge from experience

100

BPL definition

B= burden of precaution

P= possibility of injury

L= loss 

If B < PL then negligence

If B > PL then no negligence

100

Summers v. Tice: Alternative liability shifts the burden to _____

Defendants

200

Throwing a rock intending to scare A but hitting B is actionable under this doctrine

Transferred Intent 

200

Shopekeeper's Privilege requires these three elements to be valid 

(1) Reasonable belief of theft

(2) Detention in a reasonable manner

(3) Detention for a reasonable time

200

Robinson v. Lindsay: A child operating a snowmobile was held to this standard of care

Adult standard of care

200

What are the 3 elements of res ipsa?

(1) Nature of particular accident suggests it was probably due to negligence

(2) Defendant had exclusive control over instrumentality that causes accident 

(3) Plaintiff lacks direct evidence of the event causing the injury

200

Two negligent acts combine to cause one harm. Both are causes-in-fact under this doctrine

Multiple Sufficient Independent Causes

300

Conversion allows plaintiffs to recover this measure of damages

Full market value of the chattel at the time of conversion

300

Self defense permits reasonable force when the actor reasonably believes ________

They are in imminent danger of harmful or offensive contact

300

A blind pedestrian is judged by this standard 

A reasonable person with that same disability

300

Industry custom is _____ evidence of breach

Relevant but not dispositive
300

When can increased risk of future harm be recovered?

When more likely than not that harm will occur- preponderance of the evidence
400

Locking someone in a room without their knowledge isn't false imprisonment unless this happens

They are harmed or aware of their confinement 

400

A defendant who enters land during a wildfire to save their own property invokes this defense

Private necessity (still liable for actual damage)

400

D is an experienced sailor and ignores a small craft warning and sails anyway causing injury 

Breach of duty- superior knowledge/skill raises the expected care

400

Elements of negligence per se

(1) violation of a statute/ordinance/regulation

(2) statute itself must protect against type of harm for which recovery is sought

(3) person must belong to class of persons the statute is meant to protect

400

Elements of alternative liability

(1) more than one tortfeasor

(2) all tortfeasors engaged in similar conduct

(3) plaintiff was injured as a result of the actions of one of the tortfeasors

(4) plaintiff name ALL tortfeasors to action

500

D believes the land they're on is public but is actually P's private property. D sets up a tent overnight and remains there

Trespass to land- mistake is not a defense

500

Absolute privilege of public necessity definition:

intrusion or invasion or destruction onto property due to a reasonable apprehension of an imminent disaster

500

Sudden emergency doctrine elements

(1) party seeking instruction had not been negligent prior to emergency

(2) emergency was sudden and without warning

(3) reaction to emergency was spontaneous, without time for reflection

500

Define gross negligence and contrast it with ordinary negligence

Gross negligence= reckless disregard or conscious indifference to consequence

Ordinary negligence= failure to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances

500

Market share liability modifies causation by apportioning damages this way 

According to the defendants share of the market, each pays proportionally