If It Was a Book Title
Einstein's Theory of Liability
Haha...Duty
Row Row Row Your Boat Negligently Down the Lane
Cause of Death
100

The Lightning Rail - a Trolley Problem

Adams v. Bullock

100

Liability without fault

Strict Liability 

100

A social host to a third party has...?

No duty.


(It’s a policy judgement bc it would create problems for social hosts - Renolds v. Hicks)

100

B<PL: the little tug boat that couldn't.

U.S. v. Caroll Towing

100

If Curly Moe and Larry each throw firecracker over a wall and suddenly we hear a scream of pain...

Doctrine of Alternative Liability

200

The Car in the Night: Negligence Per Se

Martin v. Herzog

200

The 3 theories of liability

Negligence, Strict Liability, Vicarious Liability


special mention: No Liability

200

Landowners owe a DOC to...?

Licensees & Invitees, but not to trespassers.


(Carter v. Kinney)

200

A defendant is liable for all direct consequences of their negligent act, even if the precise, severe harm wasn't foreseeable. 

In Re Polemis

200

a defense to liability

Competing Causes 

300

Shards: Why Shower Curtains Should be the New Shower Custom

Trimarco v. Klein

300

The Birkner Test: Vicarious Liability

  1. conduct be of the general kind the employee is hired to perform (the WHAT)

  2. the employee's conduct must occur substantially within the hours and ordinary spatial boundaries of the employment (the WHEN & WHERE)

  3. the employee's conduct must be motivated, at least in part, by the purpose of serving the employer's interest. (the WHY)

300

The risk was unforeseeable?

No duty.


Duty only if the crime is foreseeable to the land owner - Posecai v. Walmart

300

Defendant’s failure to provide lifesaving equipment was not the but-for cause of Plaintiff’s husband’s drowning.

New York Central Railroad v. Grimstad

300

A little victim blaming never hurt anyone

Contributory Negligence

400

Shallow Waters

Harper v. Herman

400

Common Law elements of Apparent Agency

(a) a representation by the purported principal; 

(b) a reliance on that representation by a third party; and 

(c) a change in position by the third party in reliance on the representation

400

There is no duty to control the conduct of a third person as to prevent him from causing physical harm to another unless...

Restatement Rule

A special relation exists between the actor and the third person which imposes a duty upon the actor to control the third person's conduct

OR

A special relation exists between the actor and the other which gives the other a right to protection 

(Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California)

400

Now you need to foresee the specific harm. 

Overseas Tankship v Miller Steamship (Wagon Mound Case)


400

IE: corporations should not be able to shrug their shoulders and foist the blame. If it could be either cause...

Multiple Sufficient Causes

500

Toxic Relationshipping: Why You Should Cut Out the Middleman

Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.


500

Name 5 "abnormally dangerous" activities that are subject to strict liability.

Escaping water

Escaping animals

Explosives debris damage

Falling from the sky early aviation

Trespass to land

500

Do we really care if the old man falls down the stairs in a blackout? What did the court say?

Strauss v. Belle Realty Co.

It was misfeasance but too ruinous to allow liability.

500

We're breaking free! An unmoored ship floats downstream and bumps a second ship. They both crash into a bridge.

Kinsman Cases

And the second kinsman case is about contractual damages w grain that was difficult to unload, the court said those damages were too remote.

500

If we can prove that an accident happened, but don't have any evidence.

Res Ipsa Loquitur