Criminal court system
Criminal case pressure
Negotiating
Legal assistance
Personnel * misc
100

Outline the criminal court hierarchy

Magistrates' Court → County Court → Supreme Court – Trial Division → Supreme Court – Court of Appeal → High Court of Australia

100

Name the three major factors discussed in U3AOS1B that can affect the achievement of justice during criminal cases.

Time

Costs

Cultural differences

100

What are plea negotiations? 

pre-trial discussions between the prosecution and defence aim to reach an agreement to resolve a criminal case without a trial.

100
What is VLA?

Government-funded agency provides free legal information, duty lawyer services, and legal representation to eligible Victorians

100

What is the judges role in a criminal trial

Oversee trial, decide on admissible evidence, instruct jury.

200

Identify two reasons for organising Victorian criminal courts in a hierarchy

Specialisation - appeals

200

Give two ways a lengthy delay can negatively affect a criminal case.

witnesses' memories may fade

legal costs may increase

accused and victims may experience stress

justice may be delayed

other cases may be delayed.

200

Name one common outcome of a successful plea negotiation regarding charges

prosecution dropping some charges or reducing a charge to a less serious offence

200

What are Community Legal Centres?

independent, non-profit community organisations provide free legal advice and community education targeting local or specific disadvantaged group

200

Outline the key responsibilities of the jury in a Victorian criminal trial.

Listen to the evidence, follow the judge's legal directions, and determine a verdict of guilty or not guilty?

300

Explain how specialisation operates in the criminal court hierarchy and give an example of the type of offence or matter a higher court may specialise in

Different courts develop expertise in particular types of criminal matters. For example, the Supreme Court – Trial Division deals with very serious indictable offences such as murder.

300

An accused cannot understand English-language court proceedings. What can be done to improve the PoJ equality?  

Use an interpreter. Reduces likelihood of disadvantage because they don't understand processes or information. Substantive equality.

300

State one requirement for plea negotiations to occur fairly

they must be entered into voluntarily, and there must be sufficient evidence to support the charges

300

Name two strengths of VLA

- Any strength - Free info online, ensures fairness, accessibility, provides duty lawyers etc

300

Compare the role of barristers with solicitors

Barristers - present evidence, examine witnesses, and argue legal points in court on behalf of their clients 

Solicitors - prepare documents outside of court, research about the case, provide advice to the client.

400

A person is convicted of armed robbery in a jury trial and believes incorrect directions were given to the jury. 

Identify the purpose of an appeal and explain why a successful appeal is not guaranteed.

An appeal allows a higher court to review a lower court decision or legal error. However, even where grounds for appeal exist and leave to appeal is granted, the higher court may determine that the alleged error did not affect the verdict or amount to a miscarriage of justice. 

Lanciana v The King [2023] VSCA 78

400

Explain how legal costs can affect both access and equality in a criminal case.

High costs may prevent a person from obtaining legal assistance, reducing access. They may also create inequality because wealthier accused people may be better able to afford extensive legal representation.

400

State one strength and one limitation of plea negotiations

a strength is saving court time and public costs, while a limitation is that victims may feel justice was not served if charges are reduced

400

State one limitation of Community Legal Centres in providing access to justice

limited funding and resources, meaning they often turn away eligible individuals or cannot offer full court representation?

400

Discuss the role of legal representation in achieving equality in a criminal trial.

Legal representation balances the unequal power dynamic between the state prosecutor and the individual accused, though unequal access to top representation can create disparity

500

Name the five courts in the hierarchy from least to most superior and,

Identify and describe the original and appellate jurisdiction of each court.

Magistrate's court - Summary offences/Indictable heard summarily (No appellate jurisdiction)

Country court - Rape, armed robbery, serious drug offences

Appeals from Magi against the conviction or sanction imposed.

Supreme court - Murder/manslaughter/terrorism - Appeals from Magi court on questions of law

Supreme Court appeals div - Appeals from County/Supreme on all types of appeals.

500

Describe three costs and time impacts

Court backlogs - Appeals - Trial procedures

Solicitors fees - Appeal fees - Witness fees. 

500

Discuss whether plea negotiations promote or hinder the administration of justice

they promote efficiency and certainty of outcome, but may hinder transparency as negotiations occur behind closed doors without public scrutiny

500

Compare the requirements to qualify for VLA duty lawyer services with the requirements for grants of legal assistance

duty lawyer services use the broader income test, whereas ongoing legal representation grants require passing the stricter means test

500

Identify and explain 4 different reasons for the need of legal practitioners

Uphold rule of law - allows law to be communicated to accused in a more clear and informed manner

Ensure accused understands legal proceedings - committal proceedings, directions hearing, pleas, manner of presenting evidence

Prevent accused from personally questioning witnesses - not familiar with rules of examination, truamatic for victim

Provide objectivity - not emotionally involved in case

Provide emotional support - can provide comfort to the accused during high stress and intense police questioning and court proceedings

Help accused receive fairer outcome - protects against wrongful conviction, can argue using mitigating factors, can help navigate appeals process