🔬 Investigation Station
🔄VARIABLE VAULT
⚖️FAIR TEST LAB
📊 EVIDENCE DETECTIVES
🧠 SCIENCE SMARTS
100

QUESTION

Scientists observe dolphins feeding in the ocean and record their behaviors without changing anything.

What type of investigation is this?

ANSWER: Field study

100

QUESTION

A scientist changes the amount of sunlight plants receive and measures their growth.

What is the test variable (independent variable)?


ANSWER: Amount of sunlight

100

QUESTION

In a fair test, how many variables should the scientist intentionally change?


ANSWER: ONE

100

QUESTION

What should a scientific conclusion be based on?

ANSWER: Evidence/data

100

QUESTION

The SAME scientist performs the same investigation several times.

Is this repetition or replication?

ANSWER: Repetition

200

QUESTION

A scientist changes the amount of fertilizer given to plants and measures their growth.

What type of investigation is being conducted?

ANSWER: Controlled experiment / experiment

200

A scientist changes the amount of sunlight plants receive and measures their growth.

What is the outcome variable (dependent variable)?


ANSWER: Plant growth

200

QUESTION

A student tests whether sunlight affects plant growth.

Plant A gets 4 hours of sunlight and 100 mL of water.

Plant B gets 8 hours of sunlight and 200 mL of water.

Why is this NOT a fair test?

ANSWER: More than one variable changed.

200

QUESTION

A student says:


“This soil grows the best plants because it's my favorite soil.”


Why is this NOT a scientific conclusion?

ANSWER: It is based on opinion rather than evidence/data.

200

QUESTION

A DIFFERENT scientist follows the procedure and performs the investigation.

Is this repetition or replication?

ANSWER: Replication

300

Scientists want to determine whether the number of insects around a lake has changed.

Which method would provide the BEST scientific evidence?

A. Ask people whether they think there are fewer insects.
B. Systematically count insects at the lake over multiple observations.
C. Read one article about insects.
D. Ask another scientist for an opinion.

 

ANSWER: B

This practices the same systematic-observation reasoning that appears on the district assessment.

300

A student investigates whether ramp height affects the distance a toy car travels.

Identify:

Test Variable / IV: ?
Outcome Variable / DV: ?

ANSWER:

IV/Test = Ramp height
DV/Outcome = Distance traveled

300

QUESTION

Students want to determine whether birds prefer one feeder location over another.

One feeder contains sunflower seeds.

The other contains cracked corn.

What should the students change to make the investigation fair?

ANSWER: Use the same type of food in both feeders.

300

QUESTION

Three plants begin at the same height.

After two weeks:

Plant A grew 2 cm.
Plant B grew 7 cm.
Plant C grew 4 cm.

Which conclusion is BEST supported by the evidence?

ANSWER: Plant B grew the most during the investigation.

300

QUESTION

Why do scientists perform multiple trials?

ANSWER: To determine whether results are consistent and increase the reliability of the evidence.

400

QUESTION

Scientists want to investigate the feeding behavior of humpback whales.

Why would a field study be more appropriate than a controlled laboratory experiment?

ANSWER: It allows scientists to observe the whales' actual behavior in their natural environment.

400

QUESTION

A student tests whether the color of paper affects its temperature under a lamp.

The student uses identical pieces of black, red, and white paper.

What is:

Test Variable / IV?

Outcome Variable / DV?


ANSWER:

IV/Test = Color of paper
DV/Outcome = Temperature of the paper

400

QUESTION

Two students measure classroom temperature.

One measures beside a sunny window.

The other measures beside an air-conditioning vent.

Why might their results be different?

ANSWER: The measurement location was not controlled and could affect the temperature.

400

QUESTION

A scientist records these temperatures:

20°C → 24°C → 28°C → 32°C

If the pattern continues, what is the BEST prediction for the next measurement?

ANSWER: 36°C

WHY? The temperature increases by 4°C each time.

400

QUESTION

New reliable evidence does NOT support an accepted scientific explanation.

What should scientists do?

ANSWER: Revise the scientific explanation based on the new evidence.

500

QUESTION

Put these steps in the BEST order:

A. Analyze the data
B. Ask an investigable question
C. Draw a conclusion
D. Collect evidence/data


ANSWER:

B → D → A → C

B. Ask an investigable question
D. Collect evidence/data
A. Analyze the data
C. Draw a conclusion


500

QUESTION

A student wants to determine whether fertilizer affects plant growth.

Plant A receives fertilizer, 100 mL of water, and 8 hours of light.

Plant B receives no fertilizer, 200 mL of water, and 4 hours of light.

What TWO variables should have been kept constant?

ANSWER:

Amount of water AND amount of light

500

QUESTION

A student wants to test whether fertilizer affects plant growth.

She gives every plant exactly the same amount of fertilizer.

What's wrong with her investigation?

ANSWER:

Fertilizer should be the test/independent variable, so the amount/presence of fertilizer must change between groups.

500

QUESTION

A scientist expected plants with fertilizer to grow taller.

Instead, the data show that plants without fertilizer grew taller.

What should the scientist do?

A. Change the data to match the prediction.
B. Ignore the unexpected results.
C. Use the evidence when drawing the conclusion.
D. Repeat only the trials that supported the prediction.

ANSWER: C — Use the evidence when drawing the conclusion.

500

QUESTION

A scientific explanation has been accepted for many years. New technology allows scientists to collect better evidence that supports a different explanation.

Which statement is BEST?

A. The original explanation can never change.
B. Scientists should ignore the new evidence.
C. Scientific explanations can be revised when new evidence supports a change.
D. The oldest explanation is always the most accurate.

ANSWER: C

Scientific explanations can be revised when new evidence supports a change.