(Blank)
(Blank)
(Blank)
(Blank)
100

Define Active Inclusion

Formally integrates social movements into political processes, providing them with resources, institutional support, and collaborative decision-making roles within government 

100

Define Active Exclusion

Deliberately suppresses social movements by restricting their political access and suppressing dissent through stringent policies or legal measures

100

Define Passive Inclusion

Permits social movements limited access to political processes through established channels without actively encouraging or fully integrating their participation in decision-making

100

Define Passive Exclusion

Subtly limits social movements, allowing them public visibility but excluding them from meaningful influence in formal policy-making processes

200

Define Pluralism

A variety of interest groups have the opportunity to influence government, without any one group holding dominance. Social movements and organizations engage through established channels, often lobbying and participating in regulatory processes. This passive inclusivity allows diverse groups to attempt policy influence, though success can vary based on political access and resources

200

Define Corporatism

A political system where the state formally integrates specific organized interest groups, like business, labor, and environmental groups, into the decision-making process. Features close cooperation between the government and select interest groups, which are given institutionalized roles in shaping policies. Often results in a collaborative but potentially restrictive relationship between these groups and the state

200

Norway is an example of 

Active Inclusion through corporatism

200

Germany is an example of 

Passive Exclusion through legal corporatism

300

How does Norway's System of Active Inclusion through Corporatism work?

Labor, government, business, and environmental groups collaborate extensively. The state financially supports environmental organizations and integrates them into policymakinWhile the model promotes cooperation, it also limits independence for groups reliant on government funding, with many groups focusing on non-contentious environmental issues. Conflicts have arisen around hydropower projects, sparking civil disobedience and public demonstrations

300

How does Germany's system work? (Passive Exclusion)

Environmental organizations are often marginalized within a legalistic and hierarchical state system. They have had significant successes, like halting the construction of nuclear plants, achieved through local protests and legal action. However, systemic challenges make these wins more difficult.

300

The US is an example of 

Pluralism, passive inclusion

300

The UK is an example of

Active Exclusion

400

Explain differences between Japan, the US and Germany in terms of the birth of environmental movements

- Japan: Rapid industrialization led to severe pollution crises, sparking citizen-led protests

- Germany: environmental movements initially focused on nature conservation, pollution from industrial activities spurred more activism by the 1970s

- US: Legal frameworks such as the Clean Air Act and NEPA became significant in integrating environmental considerations into policy-making.

400

What happened in Minamata?

Minamata disease (mercury poisoning) from industrial activity

400

What causes itai itai disease?

cadmium poisoning 

400

Explain political divergence surrounding the kyoto protocol

Germany championed the Kyoto Protocol's binding targets, while the U.S. withdrew under the Bush administration, citing economic concerns. Japan, as the protocol’s host, played a mediating role but struggled with domestic economic priorities

M
e
n
u