Procedure
Ethics
Aim/Hypothesis
Strengths & weaknesses
Participants
100

In Andrade, what state were the participants in before the experiment?

Participants were bored and tired. They were ready to go home but were asked to do another experiment.

100

Did participants give fully informed consent for Andrade?

No. This could be distressful because they may not remember the unexpected memory test.

100

What is the aim of Andrade?

To find out whether doodling assisted information processing by increasing attentiveness or by enhancing memory.

100

What is a strength of Andrade?

It was a lab experiment, which limits uncontrolled variables (listening at a comfortable rate).

100

How many participants in Andrade?

There were 40 participants.

200

What did the participants listen to while they were asked to record names?

A monotonous recording of a mock telephone call about a party.

200

What is one good ethical practice for Andrade?

Participants were debriefed and were given an apology for the deception/misleading of the test.

200

What was the first aim of Saavedra & Silverman?

Examine the role of classical conditioning in relation to fear and avoidance of a particular
stimulus.

200

Name 2 weaknesses for Andrade

Participant panel(people who might have interest in psychology) which lowers validity because of bias. There was also a lack of self-reports which would have been helpful for recording daydreaming in participants.

200

How many participants for Saavedra & Silverman?

1 participant

300

What is a procedure of Saavedra and silverman?

Researchers and boy created a hierarchy of feared stimuli with each item.







300

What was an ethical issue for Saavedra & Silverman?

Exposure to distressing stimuli, but overall
the goal was to improve quality of life and
minimize psychological distress.

300

What was the second aim of Saavedra & Silverman?

Can exposure therapy reduce the disgust and
distress associated with buttons in their case study?

300

Name one strength for Saavedra & Silverman

There were standardized measures(thermometer)
before, during, and after therapy.

300

What was the main gender of the participants in Andrade?

The gender was mostly female, there were only2 males in control group, 3 males in the
experimental (doodling) group.

400

What was the Positive Reinforcement Therapy?

It was when the boy was rewarded by his mom for showing less fear and for actually handling buttons.

400

Was there anonymity for the participant?

Boy’s anonymity was preserved (privacy)

400

What is the correct word for this blank in this sentence: Will doodling assist information processing (attend a task more effectively, enhance _____)?

memory

400

Name another strength other than standardized measures for Saavedra & Silverman.

It was highly valid: long period of time using
several different data collection methods.

400

Describe the participant for Saavedra & Silverman.



He was a 9-year-old boy, Hispanic-American.

500

What was the Imagery Exposure Therapy?

It was when they asked him to imagine buttons falling on him and to think about look/smell/feel. Exposure progressed from large to small buttons and then self-reports taken on thermometer

500

Was there informed consent for Saavedra & Silverman?

 

Yes. There was informed consent from the kid and
parent.

500

Fill in the blank- Examine the role of _______ in relation to fear and avoidance of a particular
stimulus

classical conditioning

500

What were the weaknesses for Saavedra & Silverman?

It was only 1 person, subjective rating of fear/disgust, high risk of bias (researchers build rapport/relationship with participant), demand characteristics.




500

For Saavedra & Silverman, give a detailed description of what the sample of participants consisted of?

The 40 participants were divided into 2 groups(each had 20 females in them). In addition, 2 males in control group, 3 males in the experimental (doodling) group. It is important to note that these participants came from the general population with ages ranging from 18-55.

M
e
n
u