Sampling
Selection Bias
Information bias
Research paradigm
Mixed methods
100

I’m in. I’m male, aged 65 years or over, living in the GTA.

Inclusion criteria

100

I’m sometimes considered its synonym.

Sampling

100

I aim to please with my answers.

Social desirability bias

100

I’m the only truth.

Positivst

100
Let's talk, then let's count.

Exploratory sequential

200

Reach me through the list.

Sampling frame

200

We survived so conclusions are drawn from us.

Survivor bias

200

I just can’t remember what I did 3 months ago.

Recall bias

200

Let’s negotiate reality.

Pragmatism

200

Data is collected at the same time.

-Convergent or concurrent parallel

300

I have a 50/50 change of getting picked.

Probability sampling

300

I was asked, but I didn’t want to participate.

Non-response

300

I’m swayed because I know which group they are in.

Interviewer or observer bias

300

There are many realities.

Constructivism or interpretivism

300

I want to drive change.

Transformative concurrent design

400

Every nth individual will be let in.

Systemic random sampling

400

You dropped out? I stayed in and we’re so different.

Attrition bias

400

I was assigned to this group, but that was wrong.

Misclassification bias

400

I challenge the status quo.

Critical

400

Results are merged, compared, interrelated, or validated.

Triangulation or mixing

500

No rhyme, no reason. I picked you because you were there.

Convenience sampling

500

I wasn’t even asked to be in the sample.

Under-coverage bias

500

They’re watching me so I’ll behave this way.

Performance bias

500

I ask what is reality?

Ontology

500

-Numbers first, then we explain!

Explanatory sequential

M
e
n
u