i hate this
this class sucks
failing
lauren smells
random
100

Sample divided by sub-groups Example: gender and race 

Stratified Sample

100

Interpreting text by reading in between the lines 

Hermeneutics 

100

Counting occurrences to test research hypotheses 

Content Analysis

100

Occurs when someone feels inferior to the interviewer, causing them to want to give an answer that will please

Deference

100

6-10 people in a group discussion

focus group

200

Examining text for insight on human behavior

text analysis

200

conjoint experiment

two different groups are asked similar questions 

200

who you are impacts the answers you get

Responce effect

200

Deliver survey in person to those who cant read or see or disabled

face to face

200

picking people to get the answer you want 

selection bias

300

Extracting evidence from original archive records

Archival Research

300

list from which participants are chosen

Sampling frame

300

giving an answer that makes you look good

Social desirability 

300

cheaper; more random

phone

300

ICPSR

inter- university consortium for political science research 

U Michigan 1962

400

new round of people; same question

cross-sectioned survey

400

occurs when 2 variables seem casual due to an unseen third variable

Hint: 3 things to test for

Spurious

400

Eperiments entered poli sci through

Economic 

400

class climate

self administered 

400

ANES

American National Election studies 

U Michigan 1977


500

Same people/ different questions 

Longitudinal

500

Recoverable info on human thoughts and behavior: writing/images 

text

500

Those around have an effect on the response given 

Third party present

500

Types of questions 

open-ended, closed-ended, partially open-ended, scaled

500

what methods were used in weapons of weak and homestyle?

"soaking and poaking", qualitative data, participant observer  

M
e
n
u